24.05.2015 Views

A Dunántúl Története A Későbronzkorban (BTM műhely 1. kötet ...

A Dunántúl Története A Későbronzkorban (BTM műhely 1. kötet ...

A Dunántúl Története A Későbronzkorban (BTM műhely 1. kötet ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE HISTORY OF TRANSDANUBIA DURING THE LATE BRONZE AGE<br />

CHRONOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SURVEY<br />

The ethnic and cultural background of the early Urnfield Culture was the developed Tumulus culture in Western<br />

Hungary. This area was populated by the groups of the developed or rather the late Tumulus culture during the first<br />

phase of the Urnfield Culture. The culture is well defined in the areas of Vas and Veszprém counties, however,<br />

similar groups can be defined in southern Transdanubia, Baranya, northeastern Transdanubia and in the areas of<br />

Komárom and Pest counties. Their settlements can be found in inundation area isles, on the hillocks of riverside<br />

mounds; their basic economy and lifestyle being at the beginning shepherding. This is especially true for the group in<br />

the Bakony area which seems to have established its settlements here. Skeletal burial dominates the funeral rites<br />

only to be taken over by cremation later. Mound type burials are very frequent in the Bakony area, although the<br />

same can be said for the Kemenes area in the neighbouring Vas county, with some examples in the counties of Zala<br />

and Tolna as well. It was the lack of agricultural cultivation in the mountain areas which preserved hundreds of<br />

contemporary barrows for us having little or no possibility for it elsewhere.<br />

Warriors and their families evidenced by several female graves were buried under barrows in this period. The usual<br />

armory of the warriors included the type Il/a flange hilted sword, winged axes as battle axes, spearheads with curved<br />

edge, occasionally a dagger, furthermore naturally the vessels containing the remains of the funeral feast were also<br />

part of the grave furnishings. Jewelry is frequent in the female graves. Solid, open ended bracelets with scratched line<br />

decoration, ball-headed ornamented pins, different pendents, and pottery are the usual furnishings of such graves.<br />

The graves were usually covered with stones, occasionally "sarcophagi" were constructed of stone sheets to be covered<br />

by the not too high earthen mound. Under the mounds there are irregularly placed multiple burials as well<br />

which might prove the idea of these being family burials.<br />

The group defined in the area of Keszthely slightly differs from the culture of the shepherds with their mound<br />

burials. Several find types of its most important site, the cemetery of Csabrendek, seems to prove that the culture is<br />

more established in Transdanubia than the Bakony group. The difference between them may come from their different<br />

economic system and lifestyles as well. Presumably their cultures were not built on quite identical ethnicities.<br />

The four early UK find groups defined in Transdanubia (two inner Transdanubians, a northeastern and a south<br />

Transdanubian) are supplemented by a few units from the area between the Danube and the Tisza. The main find in<br />

this loose group comes undoubtedly from the Soltvadkert settlement. The early phase of the Csórva group supposedly<br />

overlaps the same période.<br />

Relatively little is known about the northeastern Transdanubian group since their finds are known mostly from<br />

surface collecting, and only a little more of the southern Transdanubian group. The most important site of the latter<br />

one can be defined to the Siklós Brickyard settlement of two levels with significant autochton Bronze Age traditions<br />

beside the Tumulus Culture. 492<br />

The same traditions can be detected in the find group of the Csórva group in spite of<br />

the fact that a Tumulus Culture find horizon of a full phase preceded its formation. All this reminds us of the fact<br />

that beside the territory east of the Tisza must also be considered as the survival of autochton Bronze Age elements<br />

further west during the Late Bronze Age. 493<br />

The time limits of the phase can be relatively easily determined with the help of the several bronze and pottery<br />

types. The upper limit is more questionable since there are such finds in the period which are still characteristic of<br />

the BC period as well. The majority of our finds however were used already in the next BD period. Parallele can be<br />

drawn with the material of our first phase, corrolated with the neighbouring areas, the circle of western Slovakian<br />

"Vor-Caka", the southern Moravian Bluöina, and the northern Austrian Herzogenburg, the younger horizons of the<br />

northeastern Hungarian Piliny, and the Egyek Culture of the Great Plains, the latest phase of the Felsőszőcs Culture,<br />

the beginnings of the Csórva group and the north Croatian Virovitica type cemeteries. 494<br />

Our flowering second phase is contemporary with the older period of the Middle Danubian Urnfield Culture.<br />

In fact the find groups of the first phase developed continually into the new period without any serious breaks.<br />

Its most important finds can be found in the Bakony area and in the joining Győr-Sopron county stretch, notwithstanding<br />

the importance of the find group of southern Transdanubia and in the northeastern part of this region.<br />

The transition seems continuous in the Keszthely area group as well. This is the flourishing of the related Csórva<br />

type finds of the southern Plains, contemporary with the early find groups of the Transdanubian UK.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!