11.06.2013 Views

Sacre impronte e oggetti - Università degli Studi di Torino

Sacre impronte e oggetti - Università degli Studi di Torino

Sacre impronte e oggetti - Università degli Studi di Torino

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28<br />

Michael Singleton<br />

dha, Quo Va<strong>di</strong>s and Buzz Aldrin (but not as yet to the carbon footprints<br />

our various life styles stamp more or less <strong>di</strong>sastrously on the environment).<br />

It could be that the marks in the rock near Tabora had already<br />

given rise to thought amongst the early hunter gatherers of the<br />

area. But of this we possess… no trace! In living memory, though not<br />

made by human hand, the eroded forms in question, had taken on<br />

meaning for the local inhabitants, the Wanyamwezi. Slash and burn<br />

agriculturalist, their ancestors had been around for at least a thousand<br />

years. I was informed that the footprints 23 had been left by a barefooted,<br />

elderly chief, long long ago, if not exactly at the dawn of time. Consequently,<br />

the prints are not simply human, nor do they speak of a young<br />

person and even less of a female peasant. They answer to the peculiar<br />

sociohistoric choices of a particular culture at a given moment in space<br />

and time when patriarchal authority was the best social bet possible.<br />

A phenomenon such as footprints in rocks, though materially identical,<br />

is thus susceptible of quite <strong>di</strong>fferent meanings. In our culture, they<br />

speak of the mysterious and often miraculous possibility enjoyed by<br />

saintly personages or fabulous creatures to leave their mark in one go on<br />

the hardest of realities – the prophet Mahomet on the temple rock in<br />

Jerusalem, Bayard, the horse carrying the four sons of Aymon, fleeing<br />

from Charlemagne, and whose hoof cleft the cliff near Dinant on the<br />

Meuse in Belgium (the former still visited by pious pilgrims, the latter by<br />

sceptical tourists). Whatever might have been the attitudes of their forebears,<br />

perhaps more assiduously “religious” than their descendants, few<br />

of the Wanyamwezi living in the vicinity showed much interest in the<br />

prints and no one apparently (still?) paid them any ritual attention.<br />

Does this mean they had sunk to the transcultural level of pure folklore?<br />

Yes and No! “Yes” in the sense that these ancestral traces were no longer<br />

(if they had ever been) central to the Nymawezi philosophy and practice<br />

of the world. “No” because the notion of folklore can only be applied<br />

equivocally to the understan<strong>di</strong>ng of cultures which ignore the axiological<br />

asymmetry between the popular (religious) persuasions of the vulgus<br />

plebs and the claims of hierarchical authorities to represent orthodoxy<br />

or the convictions of aristocratic elites to incarnate enlightened opinion.<br />

23 Petrosomaglyphs, to use the somewhat barbaric technical term, can “result<br />

from” or represent other bo<strong>di</strong>ly members and even objects such as the butt end of<br />

spears or the legs of stools.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!