Last ned 3/2011 - Kirurgen.no
Last ned 3/2011 - Kirurgen.no
Last ned 3/2011 - Kirurgen.no
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MINImalt INVASIV KIRURGI<br />
Bilde 2 og 3. Begge bildene er fra samme laparoskopiske binyreoperasjon på FOR, som er dedikert<br />
forskning og utvikling. Legg spesielt merke til høyre overarm som løftes samt instrumentet i<br />
høyre neve hvor tommelen aktiverer tuppen på instrumentet mens på bilde 2 er det pekefingeren<br />
som aktiverer instrumentet. Diatermiledningen på Volargrip tilkobles instrumentet slik at den ikke<br />
kommer i veien for kirurgens hender.<br />
beskrevet i andre studier (1.3, 6, 8, 9, 11,<br />
13, 15, 16, 25). Det ovenfor nevnte gir<br />
oss middelaldrende kirurger mulighet<br />
til et positivt syn på fremtiden. Det er<br />
for øvrig viktig at ergo<strong>no</strong>mien i hele<br />
operasjonsstuen blir vurdert for å få en<br />
funksjonell enhet.<br />
Fremtidens operasjonsrom<br />
Før byggingen av St Olavs Hospital ble<br />
det , under ledelse av professor Hans<br />
Olav Myhre, opprettet to eksperimentelle<br />
operasjonsstuer, kalt Fremtidens<br />
Operasjonsrom (FOR). Disse hadde til<br />
hensikt å forbedre sykehusets nye operasjonsstuer<br />
og dermed minske risikoen<br />
for å bringe foreldet tankegods inn i<br />
de nye stuene. Dette har vi til en stor<br />
grad lyktes med takket være industrien,<br />
Helsebygg, NTNU og Sintef som alle har<br />
vært aktive deltagere i dette prosjektet.<br />
På bilde 3 ses den ferdige operasjonsstuen<br />
for laparoskopi ved FOR. Den er<br />
spesialdesignet for laparoskopi og avansert<br />
fleksibel endoskopi, men er også<br />
godt egnet til åpen kirurgi.<br />
Surgitech har nå utviklet et komplett<br />
sett av instrumenter, inklusive trokarer,<br />
for de vanligste laparoskopiske<br />
prosedyrene. Instrumentene har CEgodkjenning<br />
og selges allerede i flere<br />
europeiske land samt i Sør-Korea og<br />
Kina. Foreløpig er det ingen markedsføring<br />
eller forhandlere av instrumentene<br />
i Skandinavia og interesserte må<br />
derfor ta direkte kontakt med Surgitech<br />
Norway for tilbud •<br />
Referanser<br />
1 Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith DW (2001) The effect<br />
of laparoscopic instrument working angle on<br />
surgeons‘upper extremity workload. Surg Endosc<br />
15:1027-1029.<br />
2 Berguer R, Gerber S, Kilpatrick G, Remler M, Beckley<br />
D (1999) A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle<br />
electromyographic reponses to the use of laparoscopic<br />
instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp.<br />
Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics 42:1634-1645.<br />
3 Berguer R, Gerber S, Kilpatrik G, Beckley D (1998) An<br />
ergo<strong>no</strong>mic comparison of inline vs pistol-grip handle<br />
configuration in a laparoscopic grasper. Surg Endosc<br />
12:805-808.<br />
4 Delagi EF, Iazetti J, Perotto A, Morrison D (1989)<br />
Elektromyographie der Extremitäten Ferdinand Enke<br />
Verlag, Stuttgart.<br />
5 Emam TA, Frank TG, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (2001)<br />
Influence of handle design on the surgeon’s upper limb<br />
movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during<br />
endoscopic suturing. Surg Endosc 15(7):667-672.<br />
6 Emam TA, Frank TG, Hanna GB, Stockham G, Cuschieri<br />
A (1999) Rocker handle for endoscopic needle drivers:<br />
technical and ergo<strong>no</strong>mic evaluation by infrared motion<br />
analysis. Surg Endosc 13(7):658-661.<br />
7 EN IEC 62366 – Ed. 1.0 – Medical devices – Application<br />
of usability engineering to medical devices. IEC<br />
Geneva (2007) Beuth Verlag, Berlin.<br />
8 Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997) Optimal port<br />
locations for endoscopic intracorporal k<strong>no</strong>tting. Surg<br />
Endosc 11(4):397-401.<br />
9 Horgan LF, O'Riordan DC, Doctor N: Neurapraxia<br />
following laparoscopic procedures: an occupational<br />
hazard. Min Invas Ther Allied Tech<strong>no</strong>l 1997; 6: 33–5.<br />
vgl. 20. Ka<strong>no</strong> N, Kasugai H, Yamakawa T: Laparoscopic<br />
surgeon's thumb. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 1172<br />
10 ISO/IEC 25062 (2006) Software engineering - Software<br />
product Quality Requirements and Evaluation<br />
(SQuaRE) - Common Industry Format (CIF) for usability<br />
test reports. Beuth Verlag, Berlin.<br />
11 Ka<strong>no</strong> N., Kasugai H., Yamakawa T. (1993) Laparoscopic<br />
surgeon’s thumb. Arch Surg 128: 1172<br />
12 Lewis JR (1991) Psychometric evaluation of an afterscenario<br />
questionnaire for computer usability studies.<br />
IGCHI Bulletin 23(1):78-81.<br />
13 Lotz JC: The suffering surgeon. Surg Endosc 1997; 11:<br />
548<br />
14 Majeed AW, Jacob G, Reed MW, Johnson AG:<br />
Laparoscopist's thumb: an occupational hazard? Arch<br />
Surg 1993; 128: 357. Van der Zee DC, Bax NMA: Digital<br />
nerve compression due to laparoscopic surgery.<br />
15 Matern U, Giebmeyer C, Bergmann R, Faist M (2001)<br />
Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic Aspects of Different Handles for Minimally<br />
Invasive Surgery – An EMG based Study. Proceedings<br />
of the Human Factors and Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics Society 45th<br />
Annual Meeting, pp 1269-1273.<br />
16 Matern U, Giebmeyer C, Bergmann R, Faist M (2001)<br />
Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic aspects of different handles for minimally<br />
invasive surgery—an EMG-based study. Proceedings<br />
of the Human Factors and Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics. Proceedings<br />
of the Human Factors and Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics Society 45th<br />
Annual Meeting, pp 1269–1273.<br />
17 Matern U, Giebmeyer C, Bergmann R, Waller P, Faist<br />
M (2002) Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic Aspects of Four Different Types<br />
of Laparoscopic Instrument Handles with Respect to<br />
Elbow Angle – an EMG based Study. Surg Endosc<br />
16:1528-1532.<br />
18 Matern U, Giebmeyer C, Bergmann R, Waller P, Faist<br />
M (2002) Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic aspects of four different types of<br />
laparoscopic instrument handles with respect to elbow<br />
angle—an EMG-based study. Surg Endosc 16:1528–<br />
1532.<br />
19 Matern U, Kuttler G, Giebmeyer C, Waller P, Faist M<br />
(2004) Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic aspects of five different types of<br />
laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic<br />
conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks:<br />
An electromyographic-based study. Surg Endosc<br />
18:1231-1241.<br />
20 Matern U, Waller P, Eichenlaub M, Rückauer KD (1999)<br />
MIS instruments: An experimental comparison of<br />
various laparoscopic handles and their design. Surg<br />
Endosc 13:756-762.<br />
21 Matern U, Waller P, Giebmeyer C, Rückauer KD,<br />
Farthmann EH (2001) Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics: requirements for<br />
adjusting the height of laparoscopic operating tables.<br />
JSLS 5(1):7-12.<br />
22 Matern U., Koneczny S.: Ergebnisse der Umfrage zu<br />
den Arbeitsbedingungen im OP auf dem Deutschen<br />
Chirurgenkongress 2004. In: Zentralbl Chir 131: 393-<br />
400 (2006)<br />
23 Matern U., Waller P. (1999) Instruments for Minimally<br />
Invasive Surgery: Principles of Ergo<strong>no</strong>mic Handles.<br />
Surgical Endoscopy 13: 174-182<br />
24 MDD, the Medical Device Directive 2007/47/EG<br />
25 Melzer A. (1996) Endoscopic instruments –<br />
conventional and intelligent. In: Endosurgery. Hrsg.:<br />
Touli J., Hunter J., Gossot D.; Churchill Livingston,<br />
New York; S. 69-95<br />
26 Mueller LP. (1993) Laparoscopic instrument grips. An<br />
ergo<strong>no</strong>mic approach. Surg Endosc 7: 465-466<br />
27 Büchel.D, Mårvik.R, Hallabrin.B, Matern.U Ergo<strong>no</strong>mics<br />
of disposable handels for minimally invasive surgery.<br />
Surg Endosc (2010) 24:992-1004<br />
206 <strong>Kirurgen</strong> nr. 3, <strong>2011</strong>