kwartalnik polskiego towarzystwa ultrasonograficznego

Wartość charakteru wzmocnienia po podaniu ultrasonograficznego środka kontrastującego w diagnostyce różnicowej litych zmian...
Doppler ultrasound of renal parenchymal neoplasms:
correlations with histopathological findings. Jpn J clin
oncol. 2004; 34:78-81.
20. Raj g.V., Bach a.M., Iasonos A., korets R.,
Blitstein J., Hann l., Russo P: Predicting the histology
of renal masses using preoperative Doppler ultrasonography.
J Urol. 2007;177:53-8
21. filippone a., Muzi M., Basilico R., giandomenico
V., trapani a.M., Bonomo l.: color Doppler flow imaging
of renal disease. Value of a new intravenous contrast
agent: sH U 508 a (levovist). Radiol Med. 1994;
87 (suppl. 1 al n.5): 50-58.
22. Matsumoto s., Minami t., Yamamoto Y., nishioka
t., akiyama t., onoue a.: Efficacy of contrast-enhanced
color Doppler ultrasonography for the diagnosis of
renal mass lesions. Hinyokika kiyo 2001; 47(5): 299-
302 [abstract].
23. siracusano s., Quaia E., Bertolotto M., ciciliato
s., tiberio a., Belgrano E.: the application of ultrasound
contrast agents in the characterization of renal
tumors. World J Urol. 2004; 22:316-22.
24. setola s.V., catalano o., sandomenico f., siani
A.: Contrast enhanced sonography of the kidney.
abdom imag 2007;32:21-28.
25. tranquart f., correas J.M., Matregani a., greppi
B., Bokor D.: feasability of real time contrast enhanced
ultrasound in renal disease. J Radiol 2004; 85:31-36.
26. Horikoshi H, ishizaka H, Moteki t, Matsumoto
M.: Differential diagnosis of renal lesions with
Us-angiography using intra arterial co2 microbubbles.
Radiat Med. 1995; 13: 217-25.
27. Prasad s.R., Humphrey P.a., catena J.R.,
narra V.R., srigley J.R., cortez a.D., Dalrymple n.c.,
chintapalli k.n.: common and uncommon histologic
subtypes of renal cell carcinoma: imaging spectrum with
pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2006; 26:1795-
806.
28. Yoshimitsu k., irie H., tajima t., Nishie A.,
Asayama Y., Hirakawa M., Nakayama T., kakihara D.,
Honda H.: MR imaging of renal cell carcinoma: its role
in determining cell type. Radiat Med 2004;22:371–376.
29. kim J.k., kim t.k., ahn H.J., kim c.s., kim
k.R., cho k.s.: Differentiation of subtypes of renal
cell carcinoma on helical ct scans. am J Roentgenol
2002;178:1499–1506.
30. zhang J., lefkowitz R.a., ishill n.M., Wang l.,
Moskowitz c.s., Russo P., Eisenberg H., Hricak H.:
solid renal cortical tumors: differentiation with ct.
Radiology 2007;244:494-504.
31. frauscher f., Pallwein l., gradl J., schurich M.,
Pelzer a., klauser a.: Evaluation of focal renal lesions
with contrast enhanced grey scale harmonic ultrasound.
Ultraschall in Med. EURoson 2005 abstracts, 2005;
26: P053.
32. lewicki a., Jędrzejczyk M., Jakubowski W.,
szerstobitow B., kidawa a., Mikucki J.: Jaką przyszłość
ma zastosowanie ultrasonograficznego środka kontrastującego
drugiej generacji w diagnostyce zmian ogni-
skowych nerek – doniesienie wstępne. Ultrasonografia
2007, 28; 43-50.
33. tamai H., takiguchi Y., oka M., shingaki n.,
Enomoto s., shiraki t., furuta M., inoue i., iguchi
M., Yanaoka k., arii k., shimizu Y., nakata H.,
shinka t., sanke t., ichinose M.: contrast-Enhanced
Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of solid renal tumors.
J Ultrasoun Med 2005; 24: 1635-1640.
34. fan l., lianfang D., Jinfang X., Yijin s., Ying
W.: Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
in solid renal parenchymal lesions with maximum
diameters of 5 cm. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:875-85.
35. Peterson c.l., Barr R.g: Evaluation of renal pathology
with an intravenous ultrasound contrast agents:
case studies. JDMs 2001;17:29-33.
36. correas J.M., claudon M., tranquart f., Helenon
o.: the kidney: imaging with microbubble contrast
agents. Ultrasound Quartely 2006, 22;53-66.
37. nilsson a: contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the
kidneys. Eur Radiol suppl 2004,14; 104-109.
38. Mitterberger M., Pelzer A., Colleselli D., Bartsch
g., Strasser H., Pallwein l., Aigner f., gradl J.,
frauscher f.: contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis
of prostate cancer and kidney lesions. Eur J Radiol.
2007;64: 231-8.
39. EfsUMB study group. guidelines and good clinical
recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound
(cEUs) – update 2008. Ultraschall in Med 2008;
29: 28 – 44.
40. kondo T., Nakazawa H., Sakai f., kuwata T.,
onitsuka S., Hashimoto Y., Toma H.: Spoke-wheellike
enhancement as an important imaging finding of
chromophobe cell renal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis
on computed tomography and magnetic resonance
imaging studies. int J Urol. 2004;11:817-24.
41. Quaia E., siracusano s., Bertolotto M., Monduzzi
M., Mucelli R.P.: characterization of renal tumours with
pulse inversion harmonic imaging by intermittent high
mechanical index technique: initial results. Eur Radiol.
2003;1:1402-12 [abstract].
42. ascenti g., zimbaro g., Mazziotti s., gaeta M.,
lamberto s., scribano E.: contrast-enhanced power
Doppler Us in the diagnosis of renal pseudotumors. Eur
Radiol, 2001,11; 2496-2499.
43. kim a.Y., kim s.H., kim Y., lee i.H.: contrastenhanced
power Doppler sonography for the differentition
of cystic renal lesions: preliminary study. J
Ultrasound Med 1999;18:581-588.
44. Park B.k., kim B., kim s.H., ko k., lee H.M.,
choi H.Y.: assesment of cystic renal masses based on
Bosniak classification: comparison of ct and contrastenhanced
Us. EJR 2007;61:310-314.
45. clevert D.a., Bensler s., stickel M., Horng a.,
strautz t., flach P., Jung E.M., Reiser M., staehler M.:
contrast-enhanced ultrasound eases interpretation of
unclear renal tumor in addition to ct, MRi and histological
findings – a case report in a young patient. Clin
Hemorheol Microcirc. 2007;36:313-318 [abstract].
ULTRASONOGRAFIA nr 34, 2008 37