Designwissenschaft und Designforschung: Ein einführender Überblick
Designwissenschaft und Designforschung: Ein einführender Überblick
Designwissenschaft und Designforschung: Ein einführender Überblick
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
Issues � <strong>Designforschung</strong> � Felder von <strong>Designforschung</strong><br />
• Design axiology: The study of worth in the Design<br />
area, with special regard to the relations between<br />
technical, economic, moral, social and esthetic<br />
values.<br />
• Design philosophy: The study of the logic of discourse<br />
on matters of concern in the Design area.<br />
• Design epistemology: The study of the nature and<br />
validity of ways of knowing, believing and feeling in<br />
the Design area.<br />
• Design pedagogy: The study of the principles and<br />
practice of education in the matter of concern to<br />
the Design area.»<br />
(Archer, 1981, p. 33)<br />
«Whilst Design Reserach can, and does enjoy the<br />
unifying characteristic of being ‹systematic enquiry<br />
whose goal is knowledge of, or in the area of human<br />
experience, skill and <strong>und</strong>erstanding that reflects man’s<br />
concern with the enhancement of order, utility, value<br />
and meaning in his habitat›, it is nevertheless even less<br />
reasonable to regard it as a single discipline than it is<br />
to regard scientific enquiry or literary scholarship as a<br />
single discipline. The sub-disciplines which go to make<br />
it up will no doubt continue to expand, divide and reform<br />
over time, in the way that science and scholarship<br />
have expanded, divided and reformed.<br />
If one takes the lexicographer’s approach, and records<br />
the meaning of the term «Design Research» on the basis<br />
of present usage, it is clear that there are already three<br />
or more basic usages established in the centers where<br />
most of the work is going on, and innumerable biases<br />
in the ways in which their bibliographies are put together.<br />
In my view it is high time that these usages and<br />
biases were recognised, and that some of the emergent<br />
constituent sub-disciplines were consolidated by the<br />
identification of their respective bodies of knowledge.<br />
I would personally favour the recognition of three such<br />
sub-disciplines:<br />
1. Design Phenomenology, in which I would include,<br />
for the time being, design history, taxonomy and<br />
technology (…);<br />
2. Design Praxiology, in which I would include design<br />
34<br />
modeling and metrology, and<br />
3. Design Philosophy, in which I would include design<br />
axiology, epistemology and pedagogy.<br />
There are overlaps between these sub-disciplines,<br />
of course. All of them, however, although at present<br />
unevenly dependent upon external disciplines, are<br />
capable of expression as coherent bodies of knowledge<br />
with credible bo<strong>und</strong>aries and specific fields of application.<br />
At a time when more and more bibliographies are<br />
being converted into computer-housed databases with<br />
unlikely titles, and when more and more academic and<br />
professional literature searches are becoming restricted<br />
to them, the establishment of recognisable markers for<br />
the centres of interest in Design Reserach is a matter of<br />
some importance.»<br />
(Archer, 1981, p. 35)<br />
Ad 2:<br />
Bruce Archer re-visited:<br />
Nigel Cross (1999)<br />
Nigel Cross, Professor für Design Studies an der Open<br />
University in London, ist seit den Sechziger Jahren in<br />
<strong>Designforschung</strong> involviert. Für Cross ist <strong>Designforschung</strong><br />
die Entwicklung, Artikulation <strong>und</strong> Kommunikation von<br />
Designwissen <strong>und</strong> er bezieht sich dabei explizit auf Archer’s<br />
generelle Definition von Forschung. (� <strong>Ein</strong>führung in die<br />
<strong>Designforschung</strong>)<br />
«At the Design : Science : Method conference of the<br />
Design Research Conference in 1980, Bruce Archer<br />
gave a general definition of research, which is that<br />
«Research is systematic inquiry, the goal of which is<br />
knowledge». Our concern in design research has to be<br />
the development, articulation and communication<br />
of design knowledge. Our axiom has to be that there<br />
are forms of knowledge peculiar to the awareness<br />
and ability of a designer, just as the other intellectual<br />
cultures in the sciences and the arts concentrate on the<br />
forms of knowledge peculiar to the scientist or<br />
the artist.»<br />
(Cross, 1999, p. 5)