English version - Fit for Work Europe

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those who participated in the expert interviews for this project for their valuable time and advice, as well as those who reviewed and provided helpful comments on earlier drafts of the report, and our partner – Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health at the University of Occupational and Environmental Health – for valuable insight and inspiration. We would also like to thank our colleagues at The Work Foundation for their help in the preparation of this report, in particular, Ann Hyams and David Shoesmith. Additionally we would like to acknowledge the content contributions of Robin McGee, Tatiana Quadrello, Michelle Mahdon and Eleanor Passmore. This piece of work was supported by a grant from Abbott. Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market 3
Page 1: Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disor
Page 5 and 6: List of Boxes and Figures Box 1. Pr
Page 7 and 8: What can be done? Executive summary
Page 9 and 10: Executive summary drug therapies ca
Page 11 and 12: • Indirect costs including lost w
Page 13 and 14: Introduction 3. How well do employe
Page 15 and 16: 3. Work and MSDs in Japan 3.1 Why i
Page 17 and 18: There are serious concerns that the
Page 19 and 20: d. Cramping of fingers, inflammatio
Page 21 and 22: Figure 3.3. Site of chronic pain an
Page 23 and 24: The difficulty in classifying WRULD
Page 25 and 26: et al., 2000). RA is usually chroni
Page 27 and 28: Work and MSDs in Japan Approximatel
Page 29 and 30: 4. MSDs and government 4.1 Costs of
Page 31 and 32: MSDs and government must contract a
Page 33 and 34: MSDs and government The Japanese we
Page 35 and 36: 4.3 Recommendations for policy make
Page 37 and 38: • Conduct workforce planning in t
Page 39 and 40: According to the MHLW Estimates of
Page 41 and 42: MSDs and health care professionals
Page 47 and 48: 5.4 Recommendations for health care
Page 51 and 52: MSDs and employers Attempts were ma
Page 53 and 54:
Japanese employers must operate on
Page 55 and 56:
Source: Japan Industrial Safety and
Page 57 and 58:
It is noted that large organisation
Page 59 and 60:
that rehabilitation is not well-int
Page 61 and 62:
MSDs and employers Given that MSDs
Page 63 and 64:
6.3 Recommendations for employers C
Page 65 and 66:
MSDs and employers • Occupational
Page 67 and 68:
MSDs and individuals indicators to
Page 69 and 70:
Number of respondents 2,500 2,000 1
Page 71 and 72:
Japan has an older population compa
Page 73 and 74:
7.3 Role of work in health outcomes
Page 75 and 76:
MSDs and individuals which were adm
Page 77 and 78:
7.4 Recommendations for individuals
Page 79 and 80:
8. Conclusions and recommendations
Page 81 and 82:
Conclusions and recommendations the
Page 83 and 84:
Brown, M. (2009). Ankylosing spondy
Page 85 and 86:
Frank, A. O. and Chamberlain, M. A.
Page 87 and 88:
Katz, W. A. (2002). Musculoskeletal
Page 89 and 90:
References MHLW - Intractable Disea
Page 91 and 92:
References Tanaka, E., Inoue, E., M
Page 93 and 94:
Appendix 1: Interviews and consulta
Page 95 and 96:
Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid The F
Page 97 and 98:
Sources: OECD (n.d.), Osterkamp and
Page 99 and 100:
Unit labour cost, relative to base
Page 101 and 102:
Practising general practitioners (G
Page 103 and 104:
All rights reserved. No part of thi
show all

English version - Fit for Work Europe

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?