21.02.2013 Views

English version - Fit for Work Europe

English version - Fit for Work Europe

English version - Fit for Work Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusions and recommendations<br />

80<br />

interventions in time. An integrated care team, involving the treating health care<br />

professionals, occupational physicians and the individual themselves should work<br />

together to establish an optimal plan of intervention and return to work.<br />

• Coordinate action. Five stakeholder groups – individuals, employers, occupational<br />

physicians, clinicians and policy makers – must embrace the principles of effective<br />

management of MSDs to reduce and prevent the impact of chronic conditions on<br />

individuals’ ability to remain at work and return to employment. Better communication and<br />

coordination must be put in place to ensure that those with MSDs receive appropriate<br />

support, and that the impact of their condition on the daily activities is minimised.<br />

The report calls upon each of the stakeholder groups to take action:<br />

• Policy makers have to acknowledge both the direct and indirect costs of MSDs. We<br />

need better measures to assess the social, economic and work impact of all MSDs,<br />

to allow the Japanese government to assess and monitor both the clinical and labour<br />

market impact of MSDs in a more ‘joined-up’ way. Considering the principal role of<br />

policy makers in advising employers on effective prevention of chronic conditions, the<br />

government should urgently review the guidelines <strong>for</strong> management of MSDs <strong>for</strong> both<br />

manual and white-collar workers.<br />

• Clinicians should prioritise staying in and returning to work as both a means and an<br />

outcome of patient treatment. For some MSD patients, early access to physiotherapy or<br />

drug therapies can reduce the severity, impact or progression of the condition; a delay<br />

in diagnosis or treatment can make recovery, job retention or rehabilitation much more<br />

difficult. Clinicians should work more closely with occupational physicians to ensure<br />

that clinical treatment is complemented by appropriate workplace interventions and<br />

vocational rehabilitation.<br />

• Occupational physicians should look beyond legal compliance in maintaining the<br />

health and well-being of employees and tailor vocational rehabilitation to individual<br />

worker needs. When reviewing the safety of workplaces, they should acknowledge not<br />

only the physical, but also the psychological impact of work on health in both manual<br />

and non-manual jobs.<br />

• Employers can change the way in which the work environment is organised (including<br />

simple changes to physical layout or to working time arrangements) to help prevent<br />

MSDs from getting worse and to help people with MSD to stay in, or return to, work.<br />

They need to do this in a way which preserves job quality, avoids excessive or<br />

damaging job demands and takes heed of ergonomic good practice. Employers must<br />

recognise that work environment and working conditions can impact the health of both<br />

manual and non-manual workers. Employers should explore successful examples of<br />

<strong>Fit</strong> For <strong>Work</strong>? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!