English version - Fit for Work Europe

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 84 Dagfinrud, H., Mengshoel, A. M., Hagen, K. B., Loge, J. H. and Kvien, T. K. (2004). Health status of patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison with the general population. Annals of Rheumatic Diseases, 63, 1605-1610 de Buck, P., Schoones, J. W., Allaire, S. H. and Vliet Vlieland, T. P. M. (2002). Vocational rehabiliation in patients with chronic rehumatoid diseases: A systematic literature review. Seminars in Arhtirits and Rheumatism, 32 (3), 196-203 de Croon, E. M., Sluiter, J. K., Nijssen, T. F., Dijkmans, B. A. C., Lankhorst, G. J., et al. (2004). Predictive factors of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63, 1362-1367 Department for Work and Pensions. (2010). Statement of Fitness to Work. A guide for General Practitioners and other doctors. Retrieved on 21 April 2011 from http://www. dwp.gov.uk/docs/fitnote-gp-guide.pdf der Tempel, H. and van der Linden, S. (2001). Withdrawal from labour force due to work disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 60, 1033-1039 Devereux, J., Rydstedt, L., Kelly, V., Weston, P. and Buckle, P. (2004). The role of work stress and psychological factors in the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Health and Safety Executive Research Report 273. London: Health & Safety Executive Ekberg, K. (1995). Workplace changes in successful rehabilitation, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 5, 253–269 Ektor-Andersen, J., Ingvarsson, E., Kullendorff, M. and Ørbæk, P. (2008). High cost-benefit of early team-based biomedical and cognitive-behaviour intervention for long-term painrelated sickness absence. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40, 1-8 European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2007). Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Back to Work Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities European Trade Union Institute. (2007). Musculoskeletal disorders: An ill-understood pandemic, Brussels: ETUI Feldtkeller, E. and Braun, J. (2002). Prevalence of spondyloarthropathy in Japan. The Journal of Rheumatology, 29(5), 1105-1107 Feuerstein, M., Shaw, W. S., Lincoln, A. E., Miller, V. I. and Wood, P. M. (2003). Clinical and workplace factors associated with a return to modified duty in work-related upper extremity disorders. Pain, 102, 51–61 Feuerstein, M., Shaw, W. S., Nicholas, R. A. and Huang, G. D. (2004). From confounders to suspected risk factors: psychosocial factors and work-related upper extremity disorders. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 14, 171-178 Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market
Frank, A. O. and Chamberlain, M. A. (2006). Rehabilitation: an integral part of clinical practice. Occupational Medicine, 56, 289-293 References Frank, J., Sinclair, S., Hogg-Johnson, S., Shannon, H., Bombardier, C., et al. (1998). Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope – if we can just get all the players onside. New Zealand Medical Association Journal, 158 (12), 1625-1631 Fukuhara, S., Suzukamo, Y., Morita, T., Takahashi, N., Konno, S., Kikuchi, S. (2003). Japanese Orthopaedic Association National Survey on Back Pain. Tokyo: Nippon Research Centre. (福原俊一、鈴鴨よしみ、森田智視、高橋奈津子、紺野真一、菊地臣一 (2003)腰痛に関する全国調査:報告書東京:日本リサーチセンター) Furuki, K., Hirata, M. and Kage, A. (2006). Nationwide Survey of Occupational Health Activities in Small-Scale Enterprises in Japan. Industrial Health, 44, 150-154 Gignac, M., Cao, X., Lacaille, D., Anis, A. and Badley, E. (2008). Arthritis-related work transitions: A prospective analysis of reported productivity losses, work changes, and leaving the labor force. Arthritis Care & Research, 59 (12), 1805-1818 Gignac, M. A. M., Badley, E. M., Lacaille, D., Cott, C. C., Adam, P. and Anis, A. H. (2004) Managing arthritis and employment: Making arthritis-related work changes as a means of adaptation. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 51 (6), 909-916 Gordeev, V. S., Maksymowych, W. P., Evers, S. M., Ament, A., Schachna, L. et al. (2010). The role of contextual factors on health-related quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 69(1), 108-112 Guzman, J., Esmail, R., Karjalainen, K., Malmivaara, A., Irvin, E. et al. (2001). Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 322, 1511–1516 Halpern, M. T., Cifaldi, M, and Kvien, T. K. (2008). Impact of adalimumab on work participation in rheumatoid arthritis: comparisons of an open-label extension study and a registry-based control group. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 68, 930-937 Hattori, S. (2006). The prevalence of chronic pain in Japan. Folia Pharmacologica Japonica, 127, 176-180. (服部政治 (2006)日本における慢性疼痛保有率 Folia Pharmacologica Japonica 127 176-180) Health and Safety Executive. (2002). Initiative Evaluation Report: Back to Work. Norwich: HSE Herenius, M. M. J., Hoving, J. L., Sluiter, J. K., Raterman, H. G., Lems, W. F. et al. (2010). Improvement of work ability, quality of life, and fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52 (6), 618-621 Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market 85
Page 1:
Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disor
Page 4 and 5:
Contents 4 1. Executive summary 6 2
Page 6 and 7:
1. Executive summary 6 The ‘Fit f
Page 8 and 9:
Executive summary 8 the data that i
Page 10 and 11:
2. Introduction 10 2.1 The global b
Page 12 and 13:
Introduction 12 2.3 International c
Page 14 and 15:
Introduction 14 2.5 Structure of th
Page 16 and 17:
Work and MSDs in Japan 16 Figure 3.
Page 18 and 19:
Work and MSDs in Japan 18 3.2 Defin
Page 20 and 21:
Work and MSDs in Japan 20 3.3 The i
Page 22 and 23:
Work and MSDs in Japan 22 average t
Page 24 and 25:
Work and MSDs in Japan 24 RA affect
Page 26 and 27:
Work and MSDs in Japan 26 3.3.4 Spo
Page 28 and 29:
Work and MSDs in Japan 28 3.4 Summa
Page 30 and 31:
MSDs and government 30 4.2 MSDs: Po
Page 32 and 33:
MSDs and government 32 of good heal
Page 34 and 35: MSDs and government 34 Figure 4.1.
Page 36 and 37: MSDs and government 36 deliver bett
Page 38 and 39: 5. MSDs and health care professiona
Page 40 and 41: MSDs and health care professionals
Page 50 and 51: 6. MSDs and employers 50 6.1 Costs
Page 52 and 53: MSDs and employers 52 6.2 The role
Page 54 and 55: MSDs and employers 54 Occupational
Page 56 and 57: MSDs and employers 56 The most freq
Page 58 and 59: MSDs and employers 58 levels of pai
Page 60 and 61: MSDs and employers 60 • Modified
Page 62 and 63: MSDs and employers 62 Box 2. Case s
Page 64 and 65: MSDs and employers 64 lower the mor
Page 66 and 67: 7. MSDs and individuals 66 7.1 Impa
Page 68 and 69: MSDs and individuals 68 Figure 7.1.
Page 70 and 71: MSDs and individuals 70 7.2 MSDs: I
Page 72 and 73: MSDs and individuals 72 and other h
Page 74 and 75: MSDs and individuals 74 Figure 7.4.
Page 76 and 77: MSDs and individuals 76 Cont. Kaize
Page 78 and 79: MSDs and individuals 78 reported wo
Page 80 and 81: Conclusions and recommendations 80
Page 82 and 83: References 82 American Chamber of C
Page 86 and 87: References 86 Hori, Y., Hoshino, J.
Page 88 and 89: References 88 Matsudaira, K., Hara,
Page 90 and 91: References 90 Rudwaleit, M., Gooch,
Page 92 and 93: References 92 Young, A., Dixey, J.,
Page 94 and 95: Appendix 2: Fit Note Sample 94 Sour
Page 96 and 97: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 96 So
Page 98 and 99: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 98 So
Page 100 and 101: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 100 O
Page 102 and 103: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid Refer
Page 104: We provide: Research Advisory Consu
show all

English version - Fit for Work Europe

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?