English version - Fit for Work Europe

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 96 Sources: OECD (n.d.), *Eurostat (n.d.), OECD (2010) OECD-Europe -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 103.6 106.9 OECD $33,080 66.8 14.6 8.5 7.7 24.2 -- 62.3 63.5 102.9 106.7 US $45,674 67.0 12.9 10.3 8.1 16.3 11.9 63.9 64.4 101.8 108.8 EU-27 $31,257 67.2* 17.2* 9.0* 8.9* 3.0* -- 61.9* 60.5* -- -- New Zealand $28.885 66.5 12.8 6.1 6.2 6.3 -- 63.9 66.5 97.8 116.1 UK $35,159 66.5 15.8 8.8 6.5 24.6 17.6 61.9 63.2 103.7 107.6 Canada $37,808 69.5 13.9 9.4 7.0 7.8 12.1 61.9 63.3 101.2 110.4 Japan $32,062 63.9 22.7 5.3 4.8 28.5 -- 69.5 66.5 95.0 101.1 2006 data 2006 data Australia $39, 660 67.6 13.3 5.7 5.4 14.7 12.0 62.2 64.4 101.2 104.9 Brazil $10,453 67.3 6.8 6.5 9.9 -- -- -- -- -- -- in PPP, 2009 GDP per capita Percentage of the population of working age Percentage of the population aged 65 and over rate, % of all unemployed Unemployment rate (%) Long term unemployment Disability prevalence, as a percentage of 20-64 population Average age of withdrawal from the labour market Labour productivity per unit labour input, relative to base year 2005 (=100) Unit labour cost, relative to base year 2005 (=100) Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market Male Female Male Female
Sources: OECD (n.d.), Osterkamp and Rohn (2007) OECD $33,139 -- -- -- -- -- US $46,337 16.0 7.2 1.3 0.3 2.70 EU-27 $30,769 -- -- -- -- -- New Zealand $28,567 18.4 7.1 2.5 0.2 -- UK $35,719 20.3 6.8 2.4 0.2 3.87 Canada $38,353 16.9 7.0 0.9 0.6 3.52 Japan $33,635 18.7 8.1 0.8 0.3 -- Australia $39,002 16.0 5.7 2.2 0.4 4.10 Brazil $9,900 -- 3.7 -- -- -- system (0/7 scale) GDP per inhabitant in PPS, 2007 Social expenditure (% GDP) Public expenditure on (% of GDP) Generosity of the welfare Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market 97 Health Incapacity related Unemployment Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid
Page 1:
Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disor
Page 4 and 5:
Contents 4 1. Executive summary 6 2
Page 6 and 7:
1. Executive summary 6 The ‘Fit f
Page 8 and 9:
Executive summary 8 the data that i
Page 10 and 11:
2. Introduction 10 2.1 The global b
Page 12 and 13:
Introduction 12 2.3 International c
Page 14 and 15:
Introduction 14 2.5 Structure of th
Page 16 and 17:
Work and MSDs in Japan 16 Figure 3.
Page 18 and 19:
Work and MSDs in Japan 18 3.2 Defin
Page 20 and 21:
Work and MSDs in Japan 20 3.3 The i
Page 22 and 23:
Work and MSDs in Japan 22 average t
Page 24 and 25:
Work and MSDs in Japan 24 RA affect
Page 26 and 27:
Work and MSDs in Japan 26 3.3.4 Spo
Page 28 and 29:
Work and MSDs in Japan 28 3.4 Summa
Page 30 and 31:
MSDs and government 30 4.2 MSDs: Po
Page 32 and 33:
MSDs and government 32 of good heal
Page 34 and 35:
MSDs and government 34 Figure 4.1.
Page 36 and 37:
MSDs and government 36 deliver bett
Page 38 and 39:
5. MSDs and health care professiona
Page 40 and 41:
MSDs and health care professionals
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47: MSDs and health care professionals
Page 48 and 49: MSDs and health care professionals
Page 50 and 51: 6. MSDs and employers 50 6.1 Costs
Page 52 and 53: MSDs and employers 52 6.2 The role
Page 54 and 55: MSDs and employers 54 Occupational
Page 56 and 57: MSDs and employers 56 The most freq
Page 58 and 59: MSDs and employers 58 levels of pai
Page 60 and 61: MSDs and employers 60 • Modified
Page 62 and 63: MSDs and employers 62 Box 2. Case s
Page 64 and 65: MSDs and employers 64 lower the mor
Page 66 and 67: 7. MSDs and individuals 66 7.1 Impa
Page 68 and 69: MSDs and individuals 68 Figure 7.1.
Page 70 and 71: MSDs and individuals 70 7.2 MSDs: I
Page 72 and 73: MSDs and individuals 72 and other h
Page 74 and 75: MSDs and individuals 74 Figure 7.4.
Page 76 and 77: MSDs and individuals 76 Cont. Kaize
Page 78 and 79: MSDs and individuals 78 reported wo
Page 80 and 81: Conclusions and recommendations 80
Page 82 and 83: References 82 American Chamber of C
Page 84 and 85: References 84 Dagfinrud, H., Mengsh
Page 86 and 87: References 86 Hori, Y., Hoshino, J.
Page 88 and 89: References 88 Matsudaira, K., Hara,
Page 90 and 91: References 90 Rudwaleit, M., Gooch,
Page 92 and 93: References 92 Young, A., Dixey, J.,
Page 94 and 95: Appendix 2: Fit Note Sample 94 Sour
Page 98 and 99: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 98 So
Page 100 and 101: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 100 O
Page 102 and 103: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid Refer
Page 104: We provide: Research Advisory Consu
show all

English version - Fit for Work Europe

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?