English version - Fit for Work Europe

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 98 Sources: OECD (2009); OECD (n.d.); WHO (2006; 2007); Lundkvist, Kastäng and Kobelt (2008); OECD (n.d.) *-practicing physicians OECD 3.4 4.2 4.4 -- -- -- -- -- -- Europe -- -- -- -- -- -- 660 45,263 -- 2004 data 2008 Australia 1.3 2.6 2.9 32.7 4.49 0.76 136 2,164 1.49 Brazil -- -- -- -- 2.46 0.63 -- -- -- Canada 2007 1.5 -- -- 19.9 4.72 0.88 215 2,249 1.09 Japan -- -- -- -- 5.73 0.92 -- -- 2.15* 2008 New Zealand -- -- -- 13.0 4.24 0.72 -- -- 0.85 UK 2005 3.2 6.7 6.3 14.1 4.11 0.81 399 6,577 0.77 US 2008 3.6 4.7 4.6 26.0 3.76 0.71 1,976 41,631 0.3 Male Female % of working days lost % of working age population inactive due to sickness and disability Total) MSD-related disability claims DALYs MSDs (% of DALYs RA (% of total) Number of RA Patients general population (‘000) Total annual cost of RA, Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market mln euros Practising general practitioners (GPs), density per 1,000 population
Unit labour cost, relative to base year 2005 (=100) 2009 Unit labour costs measure the average cost of labour per unit of output. They are calculated as the ratio of total labour costs to real output. Output per hour. If the index of a country is higher than 100, this country’s value is higher than the OECD average and vice versa. OECD (n.d.) Labour productivity per unit 2009 Output per hour. If the index of a country is higher than 100, this country’s value is higher than the OECD average and vice versa. OECD (n.d.) Average age of withdrawal from the labour market 2009 The indicator gives the average age at which active persons definitely withdraw from the labour market. It is based on a probability model considering the relative changes of activity rates from one year to another at a specific age. The activity rate represents the labour force (employed and unemployed population) as a percentage of the total population for a given age. OECD (n.d.), Eurostat (n.d.) Disability prevalence, as a percentage of 20-64 population Self-assessed disability prevalence, as a percentage of 20-64 population OECD (2010) Long-term unemployment, % of total unemployed 2009 Unemployed for one year and above. Data refer to the shorter of the following two periods: the duration of search for work, or the length of time since last employment. OECD (n.d.), Eurostat (n.d.) Unemployment rate by gender 2009 Data refer to persons who are without a job, want a job, have actively sought work in the last four weeks and are available to start work in the next two weeks or are out of work, have found a job and are waiting to start it in the next two weeks. OECD (n.d.), Eurostat (n.d.) Percentage population aged 65 and over 2009 Share of total population of age 65 and above. OECD (n.d.), Eurostat (n.d.) Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid Percentage of the population of working age 2009 Share of total population of age 15 to 64.. OECD (n.d.), Eurostat (n.d.) Gross domestic product in US dollars per capita At current prices and current PPPs 2009 Gross domestic product is an aggregate measure of production equal to the sum of the gross values added of all resident institutional units engaged in production (plus any taxes, and minus any subsidies, on products not included in the value of their outputs). The sum of the final uses of goods and services (all uses except intermediate consumption) measured in purchasers’ prices, less the value of imports of goods and services, or the sum of primary incomes distributed by resident producer units. Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market 99 OECD (n.d.) Labour indicators Variable Definition – Provided by source Source
Page 1:
Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disor
Page 4 and 5:
Contents 4 1. Executive summary 6 2
Page 6 and 7:
1. Executive summary 6 The ‘Fit f
Page 8 and 9:
Executive summary 8 the data that i
Page 10 and 11:
2. Introduction 10 2.1 The global b
Page 12 and 13:
Introduction 12 2.3 International c
Page 14 and 15:
Introduction 14 2.5 Structure of th
Page 16 and 17:
Work and MSDs in Japan 16 Figure 3.
Page 18 and 19:
Work and MSDs in Japan 18 3.2 Defin
Page 20 and 21:
Work and MSDs in Japan 20 3.3 The i
Page 22 and 23:
Work and MSDs in Japan 22 average t
Page 24 and 25:
Work and MSDs in Japan 24 RA affect
Page 26 and 27:
Work and MSDs in Japan 26 3.3.4 Spo
Page 28 and 29:
Work and MSDs in Japan 28 3.4 Summa
Page 30 and 31:
MSDs and government 30 4.2 MSDs: Po
Page 32 and 33:
MSDs and government 32 of good heal
Page 34 and 35:
MSDs and government 34 Figure 4.1.
Page 36 and 37:
MSDs and government 36 deliver bett
Page 38 and 39:
5. MSDs and health care professiona
Page 40 and 41:
MSDs and health care professionals
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49: MSDs and health care professionals
Page 50 and 51: 6. MSDs and employers 50 6.1 Costs
Page 52 and 53: MSDs and employers 52 6.2 The role
Page 54 and 55: MSDs and employers 54 Occupational
Page 56 and 57: MSDs and employers 56 The most freq
Page 58 and 59: MSDs and employers 58 levels of pai
Page 60 and 61: MSDs and employers 60 • Modified
Page 62 and 63: MSDs and employers 62 Box 2. Case s
Page 64 and 65: MSDs and employers 64 lower the mor
Page 66 and 67: 7. MSDs and individuals 66 7.1 Impa
Page 68 and 69: MSDs and individuals 68 Figure 7.1.
Page 70 and 71: MSDs and individuals 70 7.2 MSDs: I
Page 72 and 73: MSDs and individuals 72 and other h
Page 74 and 75: MSDs and individuals 74 Figure 7.4.
Page 76 and 77: MSDs and individuals 76 Cont. Kaize
Page 78 and 79: MSDs and individuals 78 reported wo
Page 80 and 81: Conclusions and recommendations 80
Page 82 and 83: References 82 American Chamber of C
Page 84 and 85: References 84 Dagfinrud, H., Mengsh
Page 86 and 87: References 86 Hori, Y., Hoshino, J.
Page 88 and 89: References 88 Matsudaira, K., Hara,
Page 90 and 91: References 90 Rudwaleit, M., Gooch,
Page 92 and 93: References 92 Young, A., Dixey, J.,
Page 94 and 95: Appendix 2: Fit Note Sample 94 Sour
Page 96 and 97: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 96 So
Page 100 and 101: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 100 O
Page 102 and 103: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid Refer
Page 104: We provide: Research Advisory Consu
show all

English version - Fit for Work Europe

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?