English version - Fit for Work Europe

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 2: Fit Note Sample 94 Source: Department for Work and Pensions (2010). Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market
Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid The Fit for Work study has looked across a range of European countries, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Japan. This approach allows us to explore how far early intervention is implemented across the world. It also enables us to see how far we may identify both enablers and barriers to early intervention given the different approaches to policies that affect the labour market, the welfare system and the health care system. To explore this we have looked widely at a number of indicators covering the: • Labour market; • Welfare system ; • Health care system. The data presented below come from various international data sources. Where possible we used 2009 data to allow for comparisons across countries for a number of different indicators. The data mainly come from the OECD. We present a selection of indicators below. Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market 95
Page 1:
Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disor
Page 4 and 5:
Contents 4 1. Executive summary 6 2
Page 6 and 7:
1. Executive summary 6 The ‘Fit f
Page 8 and 9:
Executive summary 8 the data that i
Page 10 and 11:
2. Introduction 10 2.1 The global b
Page 12 and 13:
Introduction 12 2.3 International c
Page 14 and 15:
Introduction 14 2.5 Structure of th
Page 16 and 17:
Work and MSDs in Japan 16 Figure 3.
Page 18 and 19:
Work and MSDs in Japan 18 3.2 Defin
Page 20 and 21:
Work and MSDs in Japan 20 3.3 The i
Page 22 and 23:
Work and MSDs in Japan 22 average t
Page 24 and 25:
Work and MSDs in Japan 24 RA affect
Page 26 and 27:
Work and MSDs in Japan 26 3.3.4 Spo
Page 28 and 29:
Work and MSDs in Japan 28 3.4 Summa
Page 30 and 31:
MSDs and government 30 4.2 MSDs: Po
Page 32 and 33:
MSDs and government 32 of good heal
Page 34 and 35:
MSDs and government 34 Figure 4.1.
Page 36 and 37:
MSDs and government 36 deliver bett
Page 38 and 39:
5. MSDs and health care professiona
Page 40 and 41:
MSDs and health care professionals
Page 42 and 43:
MSDs and health care professionals
Page 44 and 45: MSDs and health care professionals
Page 50 and 51: 6. MSDs and employers 50 6.1 Costs
Page 52 and 53: MSDs and employers 52 6.2 The role
Page 54 and 55: MSDs and employers 54 Occupational
Page 56 and 57: MSDs and employers 56 The most freq
Page 58 and 59: MSDs and employers 58 levels of pai
Page 60 and 61: MSDs and employers 60 • Modified
Page 62 and 63: MSDs and employers 62 Box 2. Case s
Page 64 and 65: MSDs and employers 64 lower the mor
Page 66 and 67: 7. MSDs and individuals 66 7.1 Impa
Page 68 and 69: MSDs and individuals 68 Figure 7.1.
Page 70 and 71: MSDs and individuals 70 7.2 MSDs: I
Page 72 and 73: MSDs and individuals 72 and other h
Page 74 and 75: MSDs and individuals 74 Figure 7.4.
Page 76 and 77: MSDs and individuals 76 Cont. Kaize
Page 78 and 79: MSDs and individuals 78 reported wo
Page 80 and 81: Conclusions and recommendations 80
Page 82 and 83: References 82 American Chamber of C
Page 84 and 85: References 84 Dagfinrud, H., Mengsh
Page 86 and 87: References 86 Hori, Y., Hoshino, J.
Page 88 and 89: References 88 Matsudaira, K., Hara,
Page 90 and 91: References 90 Rudwaleit, M., Gooch,
Page 92 and 93: References 92 Young, A., Dixey, J.,
Page 96 and 97: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 96 So
Page 98 and 99: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 98 So
Page 100 and 101: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 100 O
Page 102 and 103: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid Refer
Page 104: We provide: Research Advisory Consu
show all

English version - Fit for Work Europe

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?