English version - Fit for Work Europe

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 88 Matsudaira, K., Hara, N., Arisaka, M., Isomura, T. (2011). Comparison of physicians’ advice for non-specific acute low back pain in Japanese workers: Advice to rest versus advice to stay active. Industrial Health, 49, 203-208 Matsudaira, K., Konishi, H., Miyoshi, K., Isomura, T., Takeshita, K. et al. (2012). Potential Risk Factors for New-onset of Back Pain Disability in Japanese Workers: Findings from the Japan Epidemiological Research of Occupation-Related Back Pain (JOB) Study. Spine, January 2012 Matsushita, Y., Yoshiike, N., Kaneda, F., Yoshita, K. and Takimoto, H. (2004). Trends in Childhood Obesity in Japan over the Last 25 Years from the National Nutrition Survey. Obesity Research, 12, 205-214 Meijer, E., Sluiter, J. and Frings-Dresen, M. (2005). Evaluation of effective return-to-work treatment programs for sick-listed patients with non-specific musculoskeletal complaints: a systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 78 (7), 523-532 Meijer, E., Sluiter, J., Heyma, A., Sadiraj, K. and Frings-Dresen, M. (2006). Cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment in sick-listed patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: a randomised, controlled trial with one year follow-up. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 79 (8), 654-664 Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). (2006). Services and Supports for Persons with Disabilities in Japan. Retrived on 5 April 2012 from http://www.mhlw.go.jp/ english/wp/policy/dl/02.pdf MHLW. (2008a). Patient survey. 厚生労働省(2008)患者調査 (平成20) MHLW. (2008b). Survey on employment conditions of disabled persons. 厚生労働省(20 08)障害者雇用実態調査 (平成20) MHLW. (2009). Estimates of national medical care expenditure. 厚生労働省(2009)国民医療費 (平成21) MHLW. (2010a). Comprehensive survey of living conditions. 厚生労働省(2010)国民生活基礎調査 (平成22) MHLW. (2010b). Survey of work-related diseases. 厚生労働省(2010)業務上疾病発生状況調査 (平成22) MHLW. (2010c). Survey on industrial accidents. 厚生労働省(2010)労働災害動向調査 ( 平成22) MHLW. (n.d.). Annual Health, Labour and Welfare Report 2007-2008. Retrieved on 12 April 2012 from http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-hw2/ MHLW – Chronic Pain Investigative Committee. (2010). Future Strategies for Chronic Pain (Japanese only). (厚生労働省慢性の痛みに関する検討会(2010)今後の慢性の痛みについて) Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market
References MHLW – Intractable Diseases Department. (2011). Allergy and Rheumatism Policy (Japanese only). (厚生労働省: 厚生科学審議会疾病対策部会(2011) リウマチ•アレルギー対策委員会 :報告書 http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/2r9852000001nes4-att/2r9852000001newa. pdf Miyasaka, N. (2011). Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan: Changes towards globalization and its unique innovation. Inflammation and Regeneration, 31(1), 25-31 Munakata, H., Sei, M., Ewis, A.A., Umeno, M., Sato, Y. et al. (2010). Prediction of Japanese children at risk for complications of childhood obesity: gender differences for intervention approaches. The Journal of Medical Investigation, 57, 62-68 Nachemson, A., Waddell, G. and Norlund A. (2000) Epidemiology of neck and low back pain. In Nachemson, A. and Jonsson, E., (eds.) Neck and Back Pain: The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis and treatment, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 165-188f Nagami, M., Tsutsumi, A., Tsuchiya, M. and Marimoto, K. (2010). Job control and coworker support improve employee job performance. Industrial Health, 48, 845-851 Nakamura, K. (2008). A ‘super-aged’ society and the ‘locomotive syndrome’. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 13, 1-2 Nakamura, M., Nishiwaki, Y., Ushida, T. and Toyama, Y. (2011). Prevalence and characteristics of chronic musculoskeletal pain in Japan. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 16, 424- 432. (Japanese report with same data is available – (戸山芳昭 (2010)筋骨格系の慢性疼痛に係わる調査研究厚生労働省:東京) Nakata, A., Takahashi, M., Irie, M., Ray, T. and Swanson, N.G. (2011). Job satisfaction, common cold, and sickness absence among white-collar employees: a cross-sectional survey. Industrial Health, 49(1), 116-121 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Health at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing Ohkusa, Y. (2003). Empirical research for the critical value of expenditure per QALY. Iryo Syakai, 13, 121-129 Pecht, M. and Boulton, W. R. (1995). Quality assurance and reliability in the Japanese electronic industry. In Kelly, M.J. et al. (eds). Electronic Manufacturing and Packaging in Japan. Japanese Technology Evaluation Center. Retrieved on 12 April 2012 from http://www.wtec.org/loyola/ep/c6s1.htm Pugner, K. M., Scott, D. I., Holmes, J. W. and Hieke, K. (2000). The costs of rheumatoid arthritis: an international long-term view. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 29, 305-320 Punnett, L. and Wegman, D. (2004). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 14 (1), 13- 23 Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Japanese Labour Market 89
Page 1:
Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disor
Page 4 and 5:
Contents 4 1. Executive summary 6 2
Page 6 and 7:
1. Executive summary 6 The ‘Fit f
Page 8 and 9:
Executive summary 8 the data that i
Page 10 and 11:
2. Introduction 10 2.1 The global b
Page 12 and 13:
Introduction 12 2.3 International c
Page 14 and 15:
Introduction 14 2.5 Structure of th
Page 16 and 17:
Work and MSDs in Japan 16 Figure 3.
Page 18 and 19:
Work and MSDs in Japan 18 3.2 Defin
Page 20 and 21:
Work and MSDs in Japan 20 3.3 The i
Page 22 and 23:
Work and MSDs in Japan 22 average t
Page 24 and 25:
Work and MSDs in Japan 24 RA affect
Page 26 and 27:
Work and MSDs in Japan 26 3.3.4 Spo
Page 28 and 29:
Work and MSDs in Japan 28 3.4 Summa
Page 30 and 31:
MSDs and government 30 4.2 MSDs: Po
Page 32 and 33:
MSDs and government 32 of good heal
Page 34 and 35:
MSDs and government 34 Figure 4.1.
Page 36 and 37:
MSDs and government 36 deliver bett
Page 38 and 39: 5. MSDs and health care professiona
Page 40 and 41: MSDs and health care professionals
Page 50 and 51: 6. MSDs and employers 50 6.1 Costs
Page 52 and 53: MSDs and employers 52 6.2 The role
Page 54 and 55: MSDs and employers 54 Occupational
Page 56 and 57: MSDs and employers 56 The most freq
Page 58 and 59: MSDs and employers 58 levels of pai
Page 60 and 61: MSDs and employers 60 • Modified
Page 62 and 63: MSDs and employers 62 Box 2. Case s
Page 64 and 65: MSDs and employers 64 lower the mor
Page 66 and 67: 7. MSDs and individuals 66 7.1 Impa
Page 68 and 69: MSDs and individuals 68 Figure 7.1.
Page 70 and 71: MSDs and individuals 70 7.2 MSDs: I
Page 72 and 73: MSDs and individuals 72 and other h
Page 74 and 75: MSDs and individuals 74 Figure 7.4.
Page 76 and 77: MSDs and individuals 76 Cont. Kaize
Page 78 and 79: MSDs and individuals 78 reported wo
Page 80 and 81: Conclusions and recommendations 80
Page 82 and 83: References 82 American Chamber of C
Page 84 and 85: References 84 Dagfinrud, H., Mengsh
Page 86 and 87: References 86 Hori, Y., Hoshino, J.
Page 90 and 91: References 90 Rudwaleit, M., Gooch,
Page 92 and 93: References 92 Young, A., Dixey, J.,
Page 94 and 95: Appendix 2: Fit Note Sample 94 Sour
Page 96 and 97: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 96 So
Page 98 and 99: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 98 So
Page 100 and 101: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid 100 O
Page 102 and 103: Appendix 3: Benchmarking grid Refer
Page 104: We provide: Research Advisory Consu
show all

English version - Fit for Work Europe

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?