Effectiveness of measures to prevent needlestick injuries among ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Tables Table 12: Summary of best quality intervention evaluation studies, by intervention type Intervention type First author (year) Change in NSI Replace hollow-bore needles Needleless IV Orenstein (1995) [33] Sohn (2004) [34; 35] Mendelson (2003) [36] Orenstein (1995) [33] Mendelson (1998) [47] Blunt suture needle Mingoli (1996) [60] Suture Mate Bebbington (1996) [72] Box re-location Makofsky (1993) [76] Training (Universal Precautions) Beekmann (1991) [89] Report „Needlestick injuries“ 98 0.79/1,000 HCW-d to 0.3/1,000 HCW-d 34/1,000 FTE-yr to 14/1,000 FTE-yr 13.4/100,000 devices ordered to 6.4/100,000 devices ordered No statistical significant difference between intervention and control group 8 to 0 IV-related NSI 50 % gloves perforated due to sharp needle 7 % gloves perforated due to blunt needle 27 % gloves perforated without SutureMate 8 % gloves perforated with SutureMate Recapping from 30.2 % to 26.2 % 13 NSI/100 FTE to 8 NSI/100 FTE
Tables Table 13: Examples of estimated average costs per NSI for hospitals Author Country Year of publication Reference Year Average cost of NSI (in US $) 1 Jagger at al. [98] US 1990 1988 405 Gartner [48] US 1993 1990 373 Laufer and Chiarello [99] Terrell and Williams [100] Comment US 1993 1991 363 Projection US 1993 1991 320 Dale et al. [42] US 1998 1991 310 Mendelson et al. [47] US 1998 1991 636 Fassel et al. [56] US 1994 1992 531 Orenstein et al. [33] US 1995 1992 260 Dale et al. [42] US 1998 1995 561 Jagger et al. [101] US 1998 1995-97 672 (Hosp. A) 539 (Hosp. B) California OSHA* US 1998 1998 (?) 2,234 3,834 Projection; two different estimates provided by two manufactures (J&J; B&D) ECRI [95] US 1998 1998 (?) 540 Projection Hatcher [81] US 2002 1999 (?) 3,033 Used average of the two California estimates Roudot-Thoraval et al. [67] France 1999 1998 1,796 Projection Peate [68] US 2001 2001 1,035 Hofmann et al. [102] 1) in US $, if not otherwise mentioned 325 real Germany 2005 2004 (?) € 148 Projection; total costs estimated to be € 487 * Source: Tan et al. [10] and http://www.dir.ca.gov/oshsb/sharps2.html (2006-01-17) Report „Needlestick injuries“ 99
Page 1:
Effectiveness of measures to preven
Page 4 and 5:
Authors: Sandra I. Sulsky, Thomas B
Page 6 and 7:
Wirksamkeit und Wirtschaftlichkeit
Page 8 and 9:
Eficacia y rentabilidad de medidas
Page 10 and 11:
5 Cost effectiveness ..............
Page 13 and 14:
Preface Preface It has long been re
Page 15 and 16:
1 Introduction 1 Introduction Altho
Page 17 and 18:
1 Introduction scientific laborator
Page 19:
1 Introduction To complete each of
Page 23 and 24:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI 3
Page 25 and 26:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI a
Page 27 and 28:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI c
Page 29 and 30:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI s
Page 31 and 32:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI h
Page 33 and 34:
4 Intervention program evaluation 4
Page 35 and 36:
4 Intervention program evaluation u
Page 37 and 38:
4 Intervention program evaluation d
Page 39 and 40:
4 Intervention program evaluation (
Page 41 and 42:
4 Intervention program evaluation c
Page 43 and 44:
4 Intervention program evaluation t
Page 45 and 46:
4 Intervention program evaluation a
Page 47 and 48:
4 Intervention program evaluation d
Page 49 and 50: 4 Intervention program evaluation t
Page 51 and 52: 4 Intervention program evaluation t
Page 53 and 54: 4 Intervention program evaluation b
Page 55 and 56: 4 Intervention program evaluation 4
Page 57 and 58: 4 Intervention program evaluation C
Page 59: 4 Intervention program evaluation a
Page 62 and 63: 5 Cost effectiveness Both costs and
Page 64 and 65: 5 Cost effectiveness 21 % by using
Page 66 and 67: 5 Cost effectiveness the high HBV v
Page 68 and 69: 5 Cost effectiveness After the impl
Page 70 and 71: 5 Cost effectiveness estimating cos
Page 73 and 74: 6 Discussion 6 Discussion This repo
Page 75: 7 Recommendations 7 Recommendations
Page 78 and 79: 8 Bibliography [12] Verordnung übe
Page 80 and 81: 8 Bibliography A retrospective stud
Page 82 and 83: 8 Bibliography [48] Gartner, K.: Im
Page 84 and 85: 8 Bibliography [66] O'Connor, R. E.
Page 86 and 87: 8 Bibliography [86] Thomas, S.; Aga
Page 89 and 90: Tables Table 1: Overview of prevent
Page 91 and 92: Tables Table 3: Distribution of cou
Page 93 and 94: Tables Table 5: Distribution of nee
Page 95 and 96: Tables Table 7: Activity during nee
Page 97 and 98: Tables Table 9: Screening Criteria
Page 99: Tables Table 11: Quality indicators
Page 103 and 104: Annex 1: Glossary and abbreviations
Page 105 and 106: Annex 1: Glossary and abbreviations
Page 107 and 108: Annex 2: QBCR review form COMPARISO
Page 109 and 110: Annex 2: QBCR review form Character
Page 111 and 112: Annex 2: QBCR review form DISCUSSIO
Page 113 and 114: Annex 3: Definitions/guidelines for
Page 115 and 116: Annex 3: Definitions/guidelines for
Page 117 and 118: Annex 4: Working group Needlestick
show all

Effectiveness of measures to prevent needlestick injuries among ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?