Effectiveness of measures to prevent needlestick injuries among ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Annex 2: QBCR review form Annex 2: QBCR review form Reviewer Initials: ______ Rationale: Author Year Introduction Rationale clear (yes/no)? FOCUS: (check as many as apply): Other Equipment – specify: Overall Rating (Good/Fair/Poor) 1) Replacement needles □ 2) Other Sharps □ 3) Training □ 4) Other Equipment □ Report „Needlestick injuries“ 104
Annex 2: QBCR review form COMPARISON UNITS OF ANALYSIS: 1) Concurrent □ 2) Cross-over □ 3) Pre or Post Intervention (or both) □ 4) External Control Population □ 5) No Comparison Group □ 6) Can’t tell □ 1) Number of manipulations □ 2) Number of devices used or ordered □ 3) Duty hours □ 4) Number of employees □ 5) Number of hospital beds □ 6) Time period □ 7) Can’t tell □ 8) Other □ Other units – per nursing staff, per HCWs, per FTE, inventory units, pt days, daily census, or procedures – specify: Report „Needlestick injuries“ 105
Page 1:
Effectiveness of measures to preven
Page 4 and 5:
Authors: Sandra I. Sulsky, Thomas B
Page 6 and 7:
Wirksamkeit und Wirtschaftlichkeit
Page 8 and 9:
Eficacia y rentabilidad de medidas
Page 10 and 11:
5 Cost effectiveness ..............
Page 13 and 14:
Preface Preface It has long been re
Page 15 and 16:
1 Introduction 1 Introduction Altho
Page 17 and 18:
1 Introduction scientific laborator
Page 19:
1 Introduction To complete each of
Page 23 and 24:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI 3
Page 25 and 26:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI a
Page 27 and 28:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI c
Page 29 and 30:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI s
Page 31 and 32:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI h
Page 33 and 34:
4 Intervention program evaluation 4
Page 35 and 36:
4 Intervention program evaluation u
Page 37 and 38:
4 Intervention program evaluation d
Page 39 and 40:
4 Intervention program evaluation (
Page 41 and 42:
4 Intervention program evaluation c
Page 43 and 44:
4 Intervention program evaluation t
Page 45 and 46:
4 Intervention program evaluation a
Page 47 and 48:
4 Intervention program evaluation d
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
4 Intervention program evaluation b
Page 55 and 56: 4 Intervention program evaluation 4
Page 57 and 58: 4 Intervention program evaluation C
Page 59: 4 Intervention program evaluation a
Page 62 and 63: 5 Cost effectiveness Both costs and
Page 64 and 65: 5 Cost effectiveness 21 % by using
Page 66 and 67: 5 Cost effectiveness the high HBV v
Page 68 and 69: 5 Cost effectiveness After the impl
Page 70 and 71: 5 Cost effectiveness estimating cos
Page 73 and 74: 6 Discussion 6 Discussion This repo
Page 75: 7 Recommendations 7 Recommendations
Page 78 and 79: 8 Bibliography [12] Verordnung übe
Page 80 and 81: 8 Bibliography A retrospective stud
Page 82 and 83: 8 Bibliography [48] Gartner, K.: Im
Page 84 and 85: 8 Bibliography [66] O'Connor, R. E.
Page 86 and 87: 8 Bibliography [86] Thomas, S.; Aga
Page 89 and 90: Tables Table 1: Overview of prevent
Page 91 and 92: Tables Table 3: Distribution of cou
Page 93 and 94: Tables Table 5: Distribution of nee
Page 95 and 96: Tables Table 7: Activity during nee
Page 97 and 98: Tables Table 9: Screening Criteria
Page 99 and 100: Tables Table 11: Quality indicators
Page 101 and 102: Tables Table 13: Examples of estima
Page 103 and 104: Annex 1: Glossary and abbreviations
Page 105: Annex 1: Glossary and abbreviations
Page 109 and 110: Annex 2: QBCR review form Character
Page 111 and 112: Annex 2: QBCR review form DISCUSSIO
Page 113 and 114: Annex 3: Definitions/guidelines for
Page 115 and 116: Annex 3: Definitions/guidelines for
Page 117 and 118: Annex 4: Working group Needlestick
show all

Effectiveness of measures to prevent needlestick injuries among ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?