Effectiveness of measures to prevent needlestick injuries among ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

8 Bibliography A retrospective study of systematically registered exposure during the period 1990- 1994]. Ugeskr. Laeger 158 (1996) no. 13, p. 1807-1811 [31] Nelsing, S.; Nielsen, T. L.; Nielsen, J. O.: Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: exposure mechanisms and strategies for prevention. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 13 (1997) no. 4, p. 387-393 [32] Trim, J. C.: A review of needle-protective devices to prevent sharps injuries. Br. J. Nurs. 13 (2004) no. 3, p. 144, 146-153 [33] Orenstein, R.; Reynolds, L.; Karabaic, M.; Lamb, A.; Markowitz, S. M.; Wong, E. S.: Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers? Am. J. Infect. Control 23 (1995) no. 6, p. 344-351 [34] Sohn, S.; Eagan, J.; Sepkowitz, K. A.: Safety-engineered device implementation: does it introduce bias in percutaneous injury reporting? Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 25 (2004) no. 7, p. 543-547 [35] Sohn, S.; Eagan, J.; Sepkowitz, K. A.; Zuccotti, G.: Effect of implementing safety- engineered devices on percutaneous injury epidemiology. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 25 (2004) no. 7, p. 536-542 [36] Mendelson, M. H.; Lin-Chen, B. Y.; Solomon, R.; Bailey, E.; Kogan, G.; Goldbold, J.: Evaluation of a safety resheathable winged steel needle for prevention of percutaneous injuries associated with intravascular-access procedures among healthcare workers. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 24 (2003) no. 2, p. 105-112 [37] Alvarado-Ramy, F.; Beltrami, E. M.; Short, L. J.; Srivastava, P. U.; Henry, K.; Mendelson, M.; Gerberding, J. L.; Delclos, G. L.; Campbell, S.; Solomon, R.; Fahrner, R.; Culver, D. H.; Bell, D.; Cardo, D. M.; Chamberland, M. E.: A comprehensive approach to percutaneous injury prevention during phlebotomy: results of a multicenter study, 1993-1995. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 24 (2003) no. 2, p. 97-104 [38] Evaluation of safety devices for preventing percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers during phlebotomy procedures – Minneapolis-St. Paul, New York City, Report „Needlestick injuries“ 78
8 Bibliography and San Francisco, 1993-1995. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 46 (1997) no. 2, p. 21-25 [39] Trape-Cardoso, M.; Schenck, P.: Reducing percutaneous injuries at an academic health center: a 5-year review. Am. J. Infect. Control 32 (2004) no. 5, p. 301-305 [40] Younger, B.; Hunt, E. H.; Robinson, C.; McLemore, C.: Impact of a shielded safety syringe on needlestick injuries among healthcare workers. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 13 (1992) no. 6, p. 349-353 [41] Zakrzewska, J. M.; Greenwood, I.; Jackson, J.: Introducing safety syringes into a UK dental school – a controlled study. Br. Dent. J. 190 (2001) no. 2, p. 88-92 [42] Dale, J. C.; Pruett, S. K.; Maker, M. D.: Accidental needlesticks in the phlebotomy service of the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Mayo Clin. Proc. 73 (1998) no. 7, p. 611-615 [43] D'Arco, S. H.; Hargreaves, M.: Needlestick injuries. A multidisciplinary concern. Nurs. Clin. North Am. 30 (1995) no. 1, p. 61-76 [44] McCleary, J.; Caldero, K.; Adams, T.: Guarded fistula needle reduces needlestick injuries in hemodialysis. Nephrol. News Issues 16 (2002) no. 6, p. 66-70, 72 [45] Rogues, A. M.; Verdun-Esquer, C.; Buisson-Valles, I . ; Laville, M. F.; Lasheras, A.; Sarrat, A.; Beaudelle, H.; Brochard, P.; Gachie, J. P.: Impact of safety devices for preventing percutaneous injuries related to phlebotomy procedures in health care workers. Am. J. Infect. Control 32 (2004) no. 8, p. 441-444 [46] Louis, N.; Vella, G.: Evaluation d'une mesure de prevention des AES [Evaluation of a prevention measure against blood exposure accidents]. Soins (2002) no. 671, p. 45-46 [47] Mendelson, M. H.; Short, L. J.; Schechter, C. B.; Meyers, B. R.; Rodriguez, M.; Cohen, S.; Lozada, J.; DeCambre, M.; Hirschman, S. Z.: Study of a needleless intermittent intravenous-access system for peripheral infusions: analysis of staff, patient, and institutional outcomes. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 19 (1998) no. 6, p. 401-406 Report „Needlestick injuries“ 79
Page 1:
Effectiveness of measures to preven
Page 4 and 5:
Authors: Sandra I. Sulsky, Thomas B
Page 6 and 7:
Wirksamkeit und Wirtschaftlichkeit
Page 8 and 9:
Eficacia y rentabilidad de medidas
Page 10 and 11:
5 Cost effectiveness ..............
Page 13 and 14:
Preface Preface It has long been re
Page 15 and 16:
1 Introduction 1 Introduction Altho
Page 17 and 18:
1 Introduction scientific laborator
Page 19:
1 Introduction To complete each of
Page 23 and 24:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI 3
Page 25 and 26:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI a
Page 27 and 28:
3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI c
Page 29 and 30: 3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI s
Page 31 and 32: 3 Descriptive epidemiology of NSI h
Page 33 and 34: 4 Intervention program evaluation 4
Page 35 and 36: 4 Intervention program evaluation u
Page 37 and 38: 4 Intervention program evaluation d
Page 39 and 40: 4 Intervention program evaluation (
Page 41 and 42: 4 Intervention program evaluation c
Page 43 and 44: 4 Intervention program evaluation t
Page 45 and 46: 4 Intervention program evaluation a
Page 47 and 48: 4 Intervention program evaluation d
Page 53 and 54: 4 Intervention program evaluation b
Page 55 and 56: 4 Intervention program evaluation 4
Page 57 and 58: 4 Intervention program evaluation C
Page 59: 4 Intervention program evaluation a
Page 62 and 63: 5 Cost effectiveness Both costs and
Page 64 and 65: 5 Cost effectiveness 21 % by using
Page 66 and 67: 5 Cost effectiveness the high HBV v
Page 68 and 69: 5 Cost effectiveness After the impl
Page 70 and 71: 5 Cost effectiveness estimating cos
Page 73 and 74: 6 Discussion 6 Discussion This repo
Page 75: 7 Recommendations 7 Recommendations
Page 78 and 79: 8 Bibliography [12] Verordnung übe
Page 82 and 83: 8 Bibliography [48] Gartner, K.: Im
Page 84 and 85: 8 Bibliography [66] O'Connor, R. E.
Page 86 and 87: 8 Bibliography [86] Thomas, S.; Aga
Page 89 and 90: Tables Table 1: Overview of prevent
Page 91 and 92: Tables Table 3: Distribution of cou
Page 93 and 94: Tables Table 5: Distribution of nee
Page 95 and 96: Tables Table 7: Activity during nee
Page 97 and 98: Tables Table 9: Screening Criteria
Page 99 and 100: Tables Table 11: Quality indicators
Page 101 and 102: Tables Table 13: Examples of estima
Page 103 and 104: Annex 1: Glossary and abbreviations
Page 105 and 106: Annex 1: Glossary and abbreviations
Page 107 and 108: Annex 2: QBCR review form COMPARISO
Page 109 and 110: Annex 2: QBCR review form Character
Page 111 and 112: Annex 2: QBCR review form DISCUSSIO
Page 113 and 114: Annex 3: Definitions/guidelines for
Page 115 and 116: Annex 3: Definitions/guidelines for
Page 117 and 118: Annex 4: Working group Needlestick
show all

Effectiveness of measures to prevent needlestick injuries among ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?