24.02.2013 Views

Effectiveness of measures to prevent needlestick injuries among ...

Effectiveness of measures to prevent needlestick injuries among ...

Effectiveness of measures to prevent needlestick injuries among ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5 Cost effectiveness<br />

the high HBV vaccination status <strong>of</strong> the HCW population (90 %) and that, in 90 % <strong>of</strong><br />

NSI cases, it was possible <strong>to</strong> determine the serological status <strong>of</strong> the source patient. The<br />

authors further estimated the costs and benefits that would occur through the complete<br />

substitution <strong>of</strong> safer devices for standard equipment at this hospital. They estimated the<br />

incremental purchase costs <strong>of</strong> safer devices <strong>to</strong> be € 156,000 annually. Based on the<br />

estimated average cost <strong>of</strong> NSI, a full year average number <strong>of</strong> NSI (N = 166), and<br />

under the assumption <strong>of</strong> an 85 % reduction <strong>of</strong> NSI and that the reporting rate would<br />

not change, the implementation would lead <strong>to</strong> a net benefit for the worker's accident<br />

insurance <strong>of</strong> € 69,000 and <strong>to</strong> a net increase in costs for the hospital <strong>of</strong> € 135,000.<br />

Overall net savings would, according <strong>to</strong> their model calculations, only have been<br />

reached if the basic number <strong>of</strong> NSI was about 300, or twice the number observed.<br />

A simple continuation <strong>of</strong> their model shows that the break-even point for this hospital<br />

could not be reached (holding all other fac<strong>to</strong>rs constant) below a basic number <strong>of</strong><br />

reported NSI <strong>of</strong> about 1,250. A further discussion and assessment <strong>of</strong> this study is not<br />

possible because details were not yet published at the time <strong>of</strong> the preparation <strong>of</strong> this<br />

report.<br />

5.2.3 Intervention-based analysis<br />

Several <strong>of</strong> the studies discussed or mentioned in the evaluation section also evaluated<br />

the costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> their interventions. Theses studies are presented following<br />

according <strong>to</strong> the categorization used in the previous chapter.<br />

5.2.3.1 Replacement <strong>of</strong> hollow-bore needles<br />

Orenstein et al. completed a twelve-month prospective evaluation in a 900-bed urban<br />

hospital in the US in 1992 <strong>of</strong> the Bec<strong>to</strong>n-Dickinson 3 ml Safety-Lok syringe and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Baxter InterLink intravenous system. The direct costs <strong>of</strong> NSI were estimated at $ 260,<br />

including testing and PEP, employee's lost time, and other health personnel time. The<br />

purchase costs were ten times higher for the safer devices. After accounting for the<br />

61 % reduction in NSI, a net increase in costs <strong>of</strong> $ 15,000 per half-year ($ 789 per<br />

NSI <strong>prevent</strong>ed) was reported [33].<br />

Report „Needlestick <strong>injuries</strong>“ 64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!