01.03.2013 Views

Rural Income Generation and Diversification - A Case Study ... - Doria

Rural Income Generation and Diversification - A Case Study ... - Doria

Rural Income Generation and Diversification - A Case Study ... - Doria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

94<br />

more likely to use fertilisers <strong>and</strong> ox-draft power than those cultivating smaller areas. They<br />

ranked highest in terms of total income <strong>and</strong> in the proportion of farm income, <strong>and</strong> were less<br />

likely to be headed by a woman.<br />

Table 15. Household characteristics by cultivated l<strong>and</strong> area.<br />

2 ha Mean<br />

household size 5.1 6.0 7.3 6.1<br />

number of adults 3.3 4.0 4.6 4.0<br />

dependence ratio 0.60 0.63 0.67 0.64<br />

schooling%* 69 78 78 75<br />

female hh head % 41 29 17 29<br />

size of l<strong>and</strong>holdings, ha 2.16 3.77 5.11 3.70<br />

cultivated l<strong>and</strong>, ha 0.68 1.54 2.99 1.73<br />

cultivated l<strong>and</strong>/adult, ha 0.26 0.49 0.74 0.49<br />

distance to Chipata, km 127 137 147 136<br />

total income 1,005,767 1,477,814 2,451,666 1,640,701<br />

value of assets, ZMK 997,000 917,000 2,319,000 1,423,449<br />

farm income as % of total 66 69 76 70<br />

using fertiliser % 23 37 60 40<br />

using oxen % 20 17 52 28<br />

*proportion of school-aged children going to school<br />

Source: the researcher’s own dataset 2003.<br />

The area of cultivated l<strong>and</strong> seemed to be closely related to the total income the household<br />

generated. A correlation analysis of the cultivated l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> certain variables revealed some<br />

statistically-significant relationships. The correlation coefficient between the area of cultivated<br />

l<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the number of adults in the family was positive <strong>and</strong> significant at the 0.01<br />

level, as was the participation index. There were also positive correlations with the value the<br />

household assets (at the 0.05 level) <strong>and</strong> distance to the capital (at the 0.1 level). There was a<br />

negative correlation between the l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> household’s vulnerability index at the 0.1 level.<br />

The correlation coefficients <strong>and</strong> the figures in Table 15 suggest that ox ploughing increased<br />

the cultivated l<strong>and</strong> area, as did the number of adults in the household. Female-headed <strong>and</strong><br />

highly vulnerable households cultivated smaller areas. Moreover, the areas increased in size<br />

the longer the distance to the provincial capital, which may imply higher population pressure<br />

on l<strong>and</strong> in the vicinity of the capital. The asset wealth of the household also had a positive<br />

effect on the area of cultivated l<strong>and</strong>, which may reflect the contribution of oxen <strong>and</strong> oxdrawn<br />

implements to the total asset value. The participation variable describes the social activity<br />

of the household, the higher activity meaning a larger area of cultivated l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

The aim of the Zambian L<strong>and</strong> Act of 1995 was to improve the l<strong>and</strong>-registration process.<br />

However, only five per cent of the l<strong>and</strong> owned by the studied households was covered by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!