02.03.2013 Views

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HOW <strong>WAR</strong> SHAPED <strong>THE</strong> <strong>HELLENISTIC</strong> <strong>WORLD</strong><br />

12<br />

BREAK<strong>IN</strong>G BOUNDARIES:<br />

HOW <strong>WAR</strong> SHAPED <strong>THE</strong><br />

<strong>HELLENISTIC</strong> <strong>WORLD</strong><br />

The invasion of foreign territory is one of the most frequent forms of<br />

Hellenistic warfare. Precisely this aspect, the crossing of a (natural) boundary,<br />

is underlined in the res gestae of Ptolemy III (see chapter 4, section 1; OGIS<br />

54; Bagnall and Derow 2004: no. 26, ca. 241 BC): “he crossed the River<br />

Euphrates and subdued Mesopotamia, Babylonia, Sousiane, Persis, Media and<br />

the rest of the land as far as Baktria . . .” Naturally, one of the consequences<br />

of this practice was the continual change of frontiers among states, which is<br />

often mentioned by historians and equally often recorded in delimitations.<br />

War broke boundaries in a very physical sense: through invasion, through<br />

the destruction of fortification walls, and through the occupation of forts<br />

which made the boundary between a community and the next neighbor<br />

visible. Invisible boundaries – legal, social, cultural – are more difficult to<br />

break, but once broken the results are both more fundamental and more<br />

lasting than those of territorial expansion or external rule. This final chapter<br />

summarizes precisely these indirect, slow, but lasting effects of war on social<br />

and cultural mobility.<br />

In times of crisis, hierarchies and social positions tend to be confirmed<br />

and strenghthened, as both groups and individuals are asked to fulfill different<br />

duties assigned to them by law or custom. In war, the young and the<br />

old, the officers and the ordinary soldiers, men and women, foreigners and<br />

citizens, free men and slaves not only play different parts, but their lives can<br />

also be affected in different ways. If defeat means for men the loss of life –<br />

and if they are fortunate, the loss of freedom and property – for women it<br />

means captivity, and for slaves either a change of master or a chance to run<br />

away. A victory may be welcome to all, but the symbolic and material gain<br />

it will bring to a victorious general will be substantially higher than that of<br />

an ordinary soldier.<br />

The way in which wars confirmed social roles can be best seen in the case<br />

of women, whose powerlessness becomes even more evident when they are<br />

245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!