02.03.2013 Views

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BETWEEN CIVIC DUTIES AND OLIGARCHIC ASPIRATIONS<br />

2<br />

BETWEEN CIVIC DUTIES AND<br />

OLIGARCHIC ASPIRATIONS:<br />

DEVOTED CITIZENS, BRAVE<br />

GENERALS, AND GENEROUS<br />

BENEFACTORS<br />

2.1. Fighting Against a Neighbor: A Privilege of the Polis<br />

In the Hellenistic period, no less than in the Classical period, war was more<br />

than the means by which a city protected its territory – it was an essential<br />

privilege of the free and autonomous city (Will 1975). Since we lack an<br />

ancient definition of what constitutes the autonomy of a city, we have to<br />

infer the importance of the right to make war from indirect sources. The right<br />

to fight wars is more clearly formulated in civic oaths. The oath of the Athenian<br />

ephebes (Tod, GHI no. 204; cf. Lycurgus, contra Leocraten 77) begins with<br />

a reference to their military duties and to their duty to increase the civic<br />

territory: “I will not dishonour the sacred weapons and I will not abandon<br />

the comrade on the flank, whomever I may be placed next to; and I will<br />

fight to defend the sacred and holy things; I will not deliver the fatherland<br />

diminished, but larger and stronger.” The same invitation to expansion –<br />

certainly through war – is to be found in the oath of the inhabitants of the<br />

island of Kalymna when it joined the island of Kos in joined citizenship<br />

(sympolity; Staatsverträge 545, lines 26–7): “I will not allow Kos to become<br />

smaller, but on the contrary I will increase it to the best of my capacity.”<br />

The belief that the ability to successfully avert attackers and to attack others<br />

is a fundamental right of an autonomous civic community also explains why<br />

any limitation of this ability, such as the destruction of fortification walls, or<br />

the occupation of citadels and forts by foreign garrisons, was regarded as an<br />

“amputation” of freedom. In an epigram, the city wall is called “the crown<br />

of free children” (Ma 2000c: 365, n. 31), and the envoys of Kytenion in<br />

Doris, who requested financial support for the reconstruction of their city<br />

walls in the late third century BC, made it clear that their city would be<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!