02.03.2013 Views

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>THE</strong> UBIQUITOUS <strong>WAR</strong><br />

soldiers who marched from Egypt to Triparadeisos (320 BC) without pay,<br />

were a constant element of instability.<br />

In addition to economic factors, the ideology of the independent<br />

city-state provoked conflicts. The importance of military training for the<br />

young men of free citizen communities (see chapter 2, sections 1 and 2 and<br />

chapter 3) and the continual effort to defend their autonomy from the<br />

interventions of Hellenistic kings (e.g., through the expulsion of garrison<br />

troops), tyrants, and later the Romans, left only limited possibilities for a<br />

lasting peace.<br />

Finally, rival political groups within a city would occasionally try to defeat<br />

their opponents with the help of a foreign ally, promising in exchange to<br />

offer support themselves after their victory. Many of the political upheavals<br />

in late third- and second-century Athens (see section 1.2) originated in such<br />

a nexus of internal political aspirations and external alliances. Siege and war<br />

could endanger the social equalibrium and bring to the surface latent conflicts<br />

(Garlan 1974: 42–3; Will 1975: 301). Many civil wars broke out in<br />

the context of larger conflicts, with the representatives of different political<br />

groups in the same city supporting different opponents. During the Lamian<br />

War (the revolt of Greek cities against Macedonian control, 323–322 BC),<br />

the propertied classes opposed the war and appeared to be in favor of a<br />

collaboration with Macedonia (cf. Syll. 3 317, line 10). Thisbe (Boiotia) was<br />

divided during the Third Macedonian War (170 BC), and Roman supporters<br />

had to flee from the city and occupy a citadel (IG VII 2225; Sherk 1969:<br />

no. 2; Bagnall and Derow 2004: no. 45). The socio-political components of<br />

“Aristonikos’ War” in Asia Minor (133–129 BC), between Aristonikos and<br />

his supporters (allegedly the poor and recruited slaves), and the Romans<br />

and their Greek allies, are a matter of controversy. Even if the interpretation<br />

of this war as a “social revolution” is improbable, it still shows – like the<br />

Mithridatic wars – the coexistence of many different causes and hopes,<br />

ranging from the aspiration of monarchical rule to the hope of freedom.<br />

Our contemporary sources recognize the most important causes of war<br />

in human nature. Polybios makes the greed (pleonexia) of the Cretans<br />

responsible for the continual wars (van Effenterre 1948: 285–92), and a<br />

lesser-known historian, Philippos of Pergamon (IG IV.1 2 687; FgrHist 95<br />

T 1; Goukowski 1995), introduced his history of the last wars of the late<br />

Republic with these words:<br />

With my pious hand I delivered to the Greeks the historical narrative of the<br />

most recent deeds – all sorts of sufferings and a continual mutual slaughter<br />

having taken place in our days in Asia and Europe, in the tribes of Libya and<br />

in the cities of the islanders; I did this, so that they may learn also through us,<br />

how many evils are brought forth by courting the mob and by love of profit,<br />

by civil strifes and by the breaking of faith, and thus, by observing the sufferings<br />

of others, they may live their lives in the right way.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!