WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD
WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD
WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HOW <strong>WAR</strong> SHAPED <strong>THE</strong> <strong>HELLENISTIC</strong> <strong>WORLD</strong><br />
to a more privileged group of foreigmers as isoteleis (“bearing equal burdens”<br />
as the citizens) and to be given the right to own a house and land and to<br />
participate in campaigns and military contributions on the same terms as the<br />
citizens. Even then, they never actually attained citizen status.<br />
The request for financial contributions often gave foreigners an opportunity<br />
to be part of the joint defense efforts (see chapter 7, section 1; Migeotte<br />
1992: 358–63; e.g., IG VII 4263 = Maier 1959: no. 26). The aforementioned<br />
example concerns two individuals; a massive and far more radical<br />
breaking of legal boundaries was effected by the liberation, occasionally<br />
even the enfranchisement, of slaves as the ultimate effort to prevent a defeat<br />
(see chapter 2, section 2).<br />
In the realm of monarchies, such measures were unlikely to occur at a<br />
comparable scale, but even here a great crisis could trigger measures which<br />
had lasting effects. The outstanding services of professional soldiers in a<br />
crisis promoted their careers and the position of their families (see chapter<br />
4, section 2). This form of social mobility was natural, frequent, but not<br />
massive, unlike the measures taken by Ptolemy IV, when he recruited native<br />
Egyptians – the so-called machimoi – into his army for the first time, during<br />
the Fourth Syrian War (219 BC). These measures had a lasting impact on<br />
the lives of thousands, and the self-confidence won by the Egyptian machimoi<br />
because of their contribution to victory at the Battle of Rhaphia ultimately<br />
led to the native revolts of the second century (Thompson 2003: 115).<br />
In a much more material sense, mobility in the Hellenistic age meant<br />
the massive movement of populations: the carrying away of prisoners of war<br />
(women and children in particular), the migration of populations of destroyed<br />
cities, the relocation of captives or hostages (Amit 1970), deserters,<br />
and runaway slaves, the expulsion of unpleasant intellectuals (Fraser 1972:<br />
86–8; Austin 2001: 90), and the service of mercenaries. With the notable<br />
exceptions of mercenary service and the settlement of populations in military<br />
colonies, the mobility of people caused by Hellenistic wars was involuntary<br />
and frequently huge. Mobility caused by war had significant social<br />
implications, since its specific form depended on gender (e.g., fugitive men,<br />
captured women), age (children versus adults), and status (citizen versus<br />
non-citizen, free versus enslaved, wealthy versus poor).<br />
Sometimes the relocation of individuals or larger groups was only temporary,<br />
but more frequently it was lasting. Examples of mass relocations should<br />
not make us forget about the fate of individuals – for example, the story<br />
of Epikles of Axos. His tale is narrated in a letter sent by the Cretan city of<br />
Axos to the Aitolians (early second century BC; Syll. 3 622 B = I.Cret. II.v 19;<br />
see chapter 6, section 4). In this letter the magistrates of Axos claimed on<br />
behalf of their citizen Epikles citizen rights in Aitolia on the basis of a treaty.<br />
To justify this claim, they tell of the adventures of Epikles’ family. Eraton,<br />
a citizen of Axos, had come as a mercenary to Cyprus, where he married a<br />
woman of unknown name and origin. This woman gave birth to two sons,<br />
249