02.03.2013 Views

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>THE</strong> AGE OF <strong>WAR</strong>: FIGHT<strong>IN</strong>G YOUNG MEN<br />

3<br />

<strong>THE</strong> AGE OF <strong>WAR</strong>:<br />

FIGHT<strong>IN</strong>G YOUNG MEN<br />

3.1. Restless Warriors<br />

In his narrative of the Lyttian War (221–220 BC), the greatest war in Cretan<br />

history, Polybios reports an incident in Gortyn which has puzzled modern<br />

historians (Polyb. 4.53.5–7):<br />

At first all the members of the Cretan alliance (Kretaieis) took part in the war<br />

against the Lyttians, but jealousy having sprung up from some trifling cause, as<br />

is the custom of the Cretans, they quarrelled with each other . . . Gortyn was<br />

in a state of civil war, the elder citizens (presbyteroi) taking the part of Knossos<br />

and the younger (neoteroi) that of Lyttos.<br />

Such a conflict between young and old is unusual, but not unheard of. The<br />

Cretans were again divided 150 years later, over the prospect of a war against<br />

Rome. The Cretans had been terrorizing the Eastern Mediterranean with<br />

their raids, and a first attempt by the Romans to eliminate Cretan piracy had<br />

ended with a disaster in 74 BC. A few years later, in 70 BC, when the Cretans<br />

sent envoys to Rome requesting a peace treaty, they were confronted with<br />

immense demands. The Romans asked the Cretans to pay the enormous<br />

amount of 4,000 talents, to deliver their warships, and to hand over 300<br />

hostages, including their military leaders. The “older” men were inclined<br />

to accept these demands (Diod. 40.1.1), but the view of those who preferred<br />

to fight prevailed. Velleius Paterculus (2.34.1) described the 24,000<br />

Cretans who fought under the leadership of Lasthenes and Panares as “young<br />

men” (quattuor et viginti milibus iuvenes coactis). The new war ultimately<br />

led to the conquest of Crete. One may speculate whether these opposing<br />

views may have had a socio-economic background: the young men, who<br />

had not yet inherited the property of their fathers, saw in booty and slave<br />

trade a profitable source of income. The elderly men preferred peace,<br />

because the acceptance of the Roman demands did not really threaten the<br />

foundations of their economic existence. One may wish to recognize in this<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!