02.03.2013 Views

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>THE</strong> AGE OF <strong>WAR</strong>: FIGHT<strong>IN</strong>G YOUNG MEN<br />

the sanctuaries in the countryside, offering sacrifices on behalf of the people.<br />

When they arrived at the grave at Marathon, they offered a wreath and a sacrifice<br />

to those who died in war for freedom; they also came to the sanctuary of<br />

Amphiaraos. And there they demonstrated the legitimate possession of the<br />

sanctuary which had been occupied by the ancestors in old times. And after they<br />

had offered a sacrifice, they returned on the same day to our own territory.<br />

(IG II 2 1006, lines 65–71)<br />

What at first sight seems like a harmless excursion acquires another dimension<br />

when we take into consideration the fact that in this period the sanctuary<br />

of Amphiaraos was not part of the Athenian territory, but belonged to<br />

the city of Oropos. In 156 BC, the Athenians had attacked Oropos and<br />

temporarily occupied the sanctuary and the territory (until ca. 150 BC; Paus.<br />

7.11.4–12.3; cf. Plut., Cato maior 22). One generation later, the Athenian<br />

ephebes marched under arms into foreign territory, using speeches to provocatively<br />

remind the pilgrims present in the sanctuary (and themseves) that<br />

the Athenians had been the legitimate owners of the sanctuary. This done,<br />

they withdrew behind the Athenian border. Whether one still accepts the<br />

tripartite structure of rites of transition established by A. van Gennep and<br />

modified by V. Turner (rites of separation, rites of marginality, rites of<br />

reintegration) or not, this provocative and aggressive action looks very much<br />

like the survival of a rite of passage. The young Athenians were separated<br />

from urban life, they lived in the marginal area on the edge of the territory,<br />

they exposed themselves to danger by intruding into contested territory<br />

in arms, they achieved an important deed by provocatively demonstrating<br />

the claims of their city on the contested territory, and finally returned to<br />

Athens and were incorporated into the citizen body.<br />

In modern research on rituals, more attention has been paid to questions<br />

of origins – to the reconstruction of the original form and meaning of<br />

rituals – than to their transformation and survival in later periods, notably in<br />

the Hellenistic and Imperial periods. When late evidence is studied, this is<br />

usually done with the perspective of understanding earlier forms through<br />

the late evidence, and not with the aim of placing that evidence in its<br />

historical context. Consequently, the performance of rituals in Hellenistic<br />

contexts is a subject to which little attention has been paid. This is not the<br />

place for an exhaustive study of this subject, but a few selected examples<br />

may show the importance that tratidional rituals retained in the Hellenistic<br />

period in the context of the training of young warriors.<br />

We have already seen that in Athens religious rituals played an important<br />

role during the ephebeia, especially processions and sacrifices in festivals<br />

with a patriotic nature (Theseia, Epitaphia, the Panathenaic festival, commemorative<br />

anniversaries of great battles, etc.). Both the procession and the<br />

sacrifice are of great significance for the construction of identities. Processions<br />

– whether religious, military or ethnic, or demonstrations by people with<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!