02.03.2013 Views

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

WAR IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>WAR</strong> AND <strong>THE</strong> IDEOLOGY OF <strong>HELLENISTIC</strong> MONARCHY<br />

strong feelings of freedom, precisely because it curtailed their freedom to<br />

fight against each other.<br />

Royal ideology, in particular the self-representation of kings as protectors<br />

of cities, obliged the Hellenistic kings to play an active part in the establishment<br />

of peace. Based on prestige and power, kings could arbitrate in local<br />

conflicts between cities, which were a major cause of wars (Ager 1996: 20–<br />

2). One of the best documented territorial conflicts of the Hellenistic period<br />

is that between Priene and Samos, which lasted for centuries. The verdict<br />

given in 283/2 BC by Lysimachos (Ager 1996: no. 26), after scrutiny of the<br />

evidence (including the study of historiographical works), seems to have<br />

been objective, but did not settle the matter. The conflict flared up again and<br />

again in the following centuries, keeping two other kings (Antigonos Doson<br />

and Antiochos III?) and the city of Rhodes busy with the issue of arbitration.<br />

Not all kings could be as neutral as Lysimachos. The Cretan city of Gortyn<br />

suggested, in at least two of its wars against Knossos, the arbitration of<br />

a Ptolemaic king (Chaniotis 1996a: nos. 40 and 43; cf. Ager 1996: no. 128;<br />

Magnetto 1997: no. 43) – not because of the objectivity of the Ptolemies,<br />

but because of their alliance with Gortyn.<br />

As arbitrators and peace-makers, the Hellenistic kings protected their<br />

interests, earning at the same time the gratitute of cities, especially those<br />

that profited from their verdict (see Ager 1996: no. 24).<br />

4.5. War and Mortal Divinity<br />

In the Hellenistic period, military success did not only compensate for the<br />

lack of dynastic legitimacy (see section 4.1) – it could also make a mortal<br />

“godlike” (isotheos). This idea is expressed very eloquently in a hymn sung<br />

by the Athenians for Demetrios the Besieger around 291 BC:<br />

How the greatest and dearest of the gods have arrived to the city! For the<br />

hour has brought together Demeter and Demetrios; she comes to celebrate<br />

the solemn mysteries of the Kore, while he is here full of joy, as befits the god,<br />

fair and laughing. His appearance is majestic, his friends all around him and he<br />

in their midst, as though they were stars and he the sun. Hail son of the most<br />

powerful god Poseidon and Aphrodite! For the other gods are either far away,<br />

or they do not have ears, or they do not exist, or do not take any notice of us,<br />

but you we can see present here, not made of wood or stone, but real. So we<br />

pray to you: first make peace, dearest; for you have the power. And then, the<br />

sphinx that rules not only over Thebes but over the whole of Greece, the<br />

Aitolian sphinx sitting on a rock like the ancient one, who seizes and carries<br />

away all our people, and I cannot fight against her (for it is an Aitolian custom<br />

to seize the property of neighbors and now even what is far afield), most of all<br />

punish [or stop] her yourself; if not, find an Oedipus who will either hurl<br />

down that sphinx from the rocks or reduce her to ashes.<br />

(Douris, FgrHist 76 F 13; Athen. VI 253 D-F; cf. Austin 1981: no. 35)<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!