invitation - MyClimate
invitation - MyClimate
invitation - MyClimate
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Stakeholder comment Was comment<br />
taken into<br />
account (Yes/<br />
Animal husbandry<br />
Department, Govt. of<br />
Karnataka extended<br />
their full support to the<br />
project.<br />
If the family is big, is<br />
there a provision in the<br />
project to install a higher<br />
size biogas plants?<br />
Is it possible to install the<br />
plant to those who does<br />
not have cow dung but<br />
having sufficient kitchen<br />
waste?<br />
How about the<br />
maintenance of plant<br />
after 10 years?<br />
Is it possible to install<br />
units in the urban areas?<br />
No)?<br />
iv. Revisit sustainability assessment<br />
Gulbarga Biogas Project (CPA) under Biodigester Programme<br />
of Activity (PoA) SKG Sangha India, GOLD STANDARD LOCAL<br />
STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION REPORT<br />
Explanation (Why? How?)<br />
YES The project will take the assistance of the Animal<br />
Husbandry Department help in identifying the<br />
beneficiaries.<br />
YES The beneficiary has to bear the additional cost of<br />
the higher size and the project will consider it as<br />
3M 3 plant and limit the emission savings to this<br />
extent.<br />
YES The project is meant for the households having<br />
animals. Kitchen waste biogas plants does not<br />
come under this project. If the beneficiaries are<br />
ready to bear the higher cost then it is possible to<br />
Are you going to revisit the sustainable development assessment?<br />
install the unit under Govt. subsidy scheme.<br />
YES Even though the maintenance beyond 10 years<br />
period does not come under this project purview<br />
SKG Sangha will provide maintenance for the entire<br />
life time, about more than 20 years of the unit.<br />
YES Yes. The units can be installed in urban areas too if<br />
the eligible beneficiaries come forward.<br />
Please note that this is necessary when there are indicators scored<br />
‘negative’ or if there are stakeholder comments that can’t be mitigated<br />
[See Toolkit 2.7]<br />
Give reasoning behind the decision<br />
Gold Standard Passport version 2.1 July 2009<br />
Yes No<br />
There are no significant differences between the own and stake holder sustainable assessments.<br />
There are no comments by the stake holders that cannot be mitigated or monitored. Hence the<br />
revisit of sustainable development assessment is not required.<br />
v. Summary of alterations based on comments<br />
√<br />
50
Change language