20.03.2013 Views

TUNNEL ENGINEERING

TUNNEL ENGINEERING

TUNNEL ENGINEERING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Steel liner plates are available in various shapes<br />

and sizes. They may be used to support the ground<br />

if a limited excavated area of the roof or arch will<br />

stand long enough for insertion of the liner plates,<br />

starting at the top of the arch and working down.<br />

The flange of each plate is bolted to the previously<br />

erected liner.<br />

In small tunnels, ribbed or corrugated liner<br />

plates may give adequate support. In large tunnels<br />

or under heavier loads, the plates are backed up by<br />

steel ribs, against which they are blocked. Liner<br />

plates without flanges may also be used as lagging<br />

or poling. See also Art. 20.17.<br />

To prevent settlement or unbalanced load, all<br />

voids behind the liner plates should be filled by<br />

injection of pea gravel or cement grout.<br />

Small tunnels may consist of a single heading.<br />

For large tunnels, various combinations of headings<br />

are used. Some of these are known by the<br />

country of their origin, as American, Austrian,<br />

Belgian, English, German, or Italian methods, but<br />

are used in many variations. Originally, the<br />

methods required wood supports, but now steel<br />

supports are favored, where economical.<br />

Sequential Excavation Method (SEM) n<br />

Also known as the New Austrian Tunneling<br />

Method (NATM), SEM was developed in Austria<br />

but is now used worldwide. It is a tunneling<br />

method adapted to the excavation of variable and<br />

non-circular cross-section reaches of tunnel, such<br />

as highway ramps and subway stations. This<br />

underground method of excavation divides the<br />

space (cross-section) to be excavated into segments,<br />

then mines the segments sequentially, one portion<br />

at a time. Excavation sequencing by the American<br />

method, Austrian system and Belgian method are<br />

outlined below.<br />

The excavation can be carried out with common<br />

mining methods and equipment (often a backhoe),<br />

chosen according to the soil conditions; tunnelboring<br />

machines are not used. Ground conditions<br />

are assessed at the face of the tunnel or from the<br />

side of a small tunnel, which helps to decide how to<br />

proceed in the best way and determines the choice<br />

of equipment and lining. It should be noted that the<br />

combination of ground treatment and SEM for the<br />

excavation of uniform cross-section tunnels would<br />

generally be more expensive than the use of<br />

pressurized face TBM construction under American<br />

underground construction labor and economic<br />

<strong>TUNNEL</strong> <strong>ENGINEERING</strong><br />

Tunnel Engineering n 20.29<br />

conditions. Thus the application of SEM would<br />

be limited economically to variable geometry<br />

structures. However for shallow tunnels, such<br />

structures could probably be more economically<br />

constructed using cut-and-cover techniques.<br />

SEM requires extremely dry conditions; dewatering<br />

is often necessary before the excavation<br />

can proceed. SEM involves careful sequencing of<br />

the excavation as well as installation of supports.<br />

Shotcrete (a kind of concrete sprayed from highpowered<br />

hoses) may be used to line the tunnel or<br />

support the face, and grouting (the injection of a<br />

cementing or chemical agent into the soil) may be<br />

used to increase the soil’s strength and reduce its<br />

permeability. Because of the requirements of this<br />

method, the rate of excavation is slow. Use of this<br />

method in saturated, non-cohesive granular soils<br />

would require the use of groundwater control and<br />

ground improvement techniques. One real concern<br />

with the use of SEM in granular soils is sudden<br />

uncontrollable ground loss, often resulting in<br />

surface sinkholes. This can happen when the<br />

selected ground improvement method is unsuccessful<br />

because of localized variation in ground<br />

conditions.<br />

One method often used to control groundwater<br />

is compressed air. However, the high air pressures<br />

often required might make the use of compressed<br />

air tunneling uneconomical in comparison to other<br />

possible methods. It is for similar reasons that shield<br />

tunneling using compressed air has been replaced<br />

by tunneling with pressurized face tunnel boring<br />

machines. Another commonly used method of<br />

controlling groundwater is dewatering. However,<br />

unrestricted dewatering can have a significant<br />

effect on adjacent foundations. An approach that<br />

has been used with variable success overseas has<br />

been to install groundwater cut-off walls (slurry<br />

walls, etc.) along both sides of the right-of-way and<br />

then dewatering inside the cut-off. When dewatering<br />

sands, running or fast-raveling ground, conditions<br />

may result so that some form of ground<br />

improvement, such as closely spaced groutable<br />

spiles or horizontal jet grouting above the crown of<br />

the excavation could be required. Two other ground<br />

improvement methods that could be used are jet<br />

grouting and chemical grouting. Each method<br />

would be used to create a block of stabilized ground<br />

through which the tunnels could be excavated.<br />

American Method n As shown in Fig. 20.15a,<br />

excavation starts with (1) a top heading at the<br />

Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)<br />

Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.<br />

Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!