You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Kalpana Kochhar and Ejaz Ghani<br />
trade liberalization via the granting of MFN status to generate the greatest<br />
gains for <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong>, it is critical that there are accompanying<br />
reforms of trade facilitation and connectivity. <strong>Trade</strong> facilitation reforms<br />
will lead to the reduction of behind-the-border barriers, and decrease<br />
the cost of trading across borders. These reforms could include improvements<br />
in infrastructure, institutions, services, procedures, and regulatory<br />
systems. The results of general equilibrium simulations (described in detail<br />
later on) suggest that <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s granting of MFN status to <strong>India</strong> will<br />
generate larger trade benefits only if it is supported by improved trade<br />
facilitation and connectivity. In other words, the net economic impact of<br />
improved trade facilitation would be larger for both <strong>Pakistan</strong> and <strong>India</strong>,<br />
and eventually would lead to stronger economic growth for the region.<br />
What is remarkable about South Asia is that it is the second fastest<br />
growing region in the world, but it is also the least integrated region. The<br />
region has integrated with the world, but not with its neighbors. This<br />
low level of integration has implications for prosperity and the pace of<br />
poverty reduction in South Asia. Two of the poorest South Asian countries,<br />
Afghanistan and Nepal, are land-locked. Several lagging regions<br />
of the larger South Asian countries of Bangladesh, <strong>India</strong>, and <strong>Pakistan</strong><br />
are located in border areas. Out of the 14 states in <strong>India</strong> that have borders<br />
with neighboring countries, 12 have per capita income levels at<br />
or below the national average (Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya,<br />
Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura, Manipur, West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar<br />
Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, and Rajasthan). In <strong>Pakistan</strong>, per capita<br />
income is lower than average in the border provinces of Khyber<br />
Pakhtunkhwa, Baluchistan, and rural Sindh. In Bangladesh, the border<br />
districts tend to have per capita incomes lower than the national average.<br />
Typically, these sub-regions have poor connectivity with markets<br />
in neighboring countries. This in part explains why the poverty mass in<br />
South Asia is concentrated in the lagging regions, many in the border<br />
regions, while economic mass is concentrated in the leading regions.<br />
South Asia’s coming demographic transition, and the fact that traditional<br />
advanced country partners may have entered a prolonged slowdown,<br />
provide new momentum for local and regional integration.<br />
Improved peace and stability, the demographic transition, and better<br />
trade facilitation will make domestic markets even larger. Increased regional<br />
trade could be the catalyst that attracts global production centers to<br />
| 98 |