26.03.2013 Views

Pakistan-India Trade:

Pakistan-India Trade:

Pakistan-India Trade:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kalpana Kochhar and Ejaz Ghani<br />

trade liberalization via the granting of MFN status to generate the greatest<br />

gains for <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong>, it is critical that there are accompanying<br />

reforms of trade facilitation and connectivity. <strong>Trade</strong> facilitation reforms<br />

will lead to the reduction of behind-the-border barriers, and decrease<br />

the cost of trading across borders. These reforms could include improvements<br />

in infrastructure, institutions, services, procedures, and regulatory<br />

systems. The results of general equilibrium simulations (described in detail<br />

later on) suggest that <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s granting of MFN status to <strong>India</strong> will<br />

generate larger trade benefits only if it is supported by improved trade<br />

facilitation and connectivity. In other words, the net economic impact of<br />

improved trade facilitation would be larger for both <strong>Pakistan</strong> and <strong>India</strong>,<br />

and eventually would lead to stronger economic growth for the region.<br />

What is remarkable about South Asia is that it is the second fastest<br />

growing region in the world, but it is also the least integrated region. The<br />

region has integrated with the world, but not with its neighbors. This<br />

low level of integration has implications for prosperity and the pace of<br />

poverty reduction in South Asia. Two of the poorest South Asian countries,<br />

Afghanistan and Nepal, are land-locked. Several lagging regions<br />

of the larger South Asian countries of Bangladesh, <strong>India</strong>, and <strong>Pakistan</strong><br />

are located in border areas. Out of the 14 states in <strong>India</strong> that have borders<br />

with neighboring countries, 12 have per capita income levels at<br />

or below the national average (Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya,<br />

Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura, Manipur, West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar<br />

Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, and Rajasthan). In <strong>Pakistan</strong>, per capita<br />

income is lower than average in the border provinces of Khyber<br />

Pakhtunkhwa, Baluchistan, and rural Sindh. In Bangladesh, the border<br />

districts tend to have per capita incomes lower than the national average.<br />

Typically, these sub-regions have poor connectivity with markets<br />

in neighboring countries. This in part explains why the poverty mass in<br />

South Asia is concentrated in the lagging regions, many in the border<br />

regions, while economic mass is concentrated in the leading regions.<br />

South Asia’s coming demographic transition, and the fact that traditional<br />

advanced country partners may have entered a prolonged slowdown,<br />

provide new momentum for local and regional integration.<br />

Improved peace and stability, the demographic transition, and better<br />

trade facilitation will make domestic markets even larger. Increased regional<br />

trade could be the catalyst that attracts global production centers to<br />

| 98 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!