26.03.2013 Views

Pakistan-India Trade:

Pakistan-India Trade:

Pakistan-India Trade:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

What Can <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong> Do To Maximize the Benefits from <strong>Trade</strong>?<br />

percent. The CGE simulation suggests significant gains for both <strong>Pakistan</strong><br />

and <strong>India</strong> under these scenarios. Not surprisingly, the gains are higher<br />

with improvements in trade facilitation.<br />

The simulations indicate that the welfare effects of MFN would be<br />

very high for <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong> if trade policy liberalization is accompanied<br />

by improved trade facilitation measures, and in particular reduced<br />

transport costs. Therefore, improvement of connectivity and trade facilitation<br />

between <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong> should get the utmost priority in<br />

order to make the benefits arising from new trading arrangements more<br />

inclusive. The global CGE simulation suggests that there would be some<br />

trade diversion after <strong>Pakistan</strong> grants MFN status to <strong>India</strong>, as <strong>Pakistan</strong><br />

would divert some of its imports from other countries to <strong>India</strong>. But the<br />

simulations suggest that this trade diversion would result in negligible<br />

welfare effects on the other countries.<br />

Figure 2 shows a list of sectors that would benefit from a rise in<br />

imports from <strong>India</strong>. These benefits would arise due to <strong>India</strong>’s unit-cost<br />

advantage compared to that of <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s other trading partners. The<br />

change in imports by <strong>Pakistan</strong> from <strong>India</strong> would vary from dairy products<br />

to vegetables, fruits, and nuts. <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s imports from <strong>India</strong> would<br />

rise in chemicals, rubber and plastic, food processing, mineral fuels (petroleum<br />

and coal products), metals, machinery and equipment, textiles,<br />

leather products, and sugar, for example.<br />

However, under the MFN-plus-trade facilitation scenario, there<br />

would be much larger rises in imports from <strong>India</strong>. <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s exports<br />

to <strong>India</strong>, meanwhile, would rise by a staggering 202 percent under the<br />

MFN-plus-trade-facilitation scenario, against only 0.19 percent under<br />

the mere MFN scenario.<br />

Option 2: SAFTA (with or without MFN given to <strong>India</strong> and trade facilitation<br />

between <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong>)<br />

Full implementation of SAFTA refers to a situation where the customs<br />

duties of all traded goods are reduced to zero by the year 2016.<br />

Three scenarios are simulated here. First, the full implementation of<br />

SAFTA; second, full implementation of SAFTA with the granting of<br />

MFN by <strong>Pakistan</strong> to <strong>India</strong>; and third, full implementation of SAFTA,<br />

MFN, and trade facilitation improvements. The results suggest that the<br />

| 105 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!