You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Nisha Taneja<br />
through the Attari/Wagah border, infrastructure that remains inadequate,<br />
and the poor quality of rolling stock are some of the problems that traders<br />
have faced for a long time, and continue to face now. A scarcity of<br />
wagons, and difficulties in allotting them, have encouraged agents to seek<br />
huge rents from traders in exchange for the allotment of wagons. Such a<br />
non-transparent trading environment restricts the free flow of information,<br />
and creates uncertainty for traders. It has also been found that traders<br />
in Kolkata, located in eastern <strong>India</strong>, find it difficult to trade through the<br />
Attari/Wagah land border, because information on how to trade by the<br />
rail route is not accessible to them. Therefore, these consignments are sent<br />
by sea to Colombo and then to Karachi (Taneja 2007). Another major<br />
problem is that current agreements permit only certain types of wagons to<br />
move between <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong>. This limits the transportation of containerized<br />
wagons, and consequently the movement of those commodities<br />
that require containerization. As a result, containerized cargo destined for<br />
<strong>Pakistan</strong> moves via a circuitous route through the port in Mumbai, instead<br />
of through the much shorter direct route through Attari/Wagah.<br />
The agenda for improving rail transport should include the implementation<br />
of mechanisms that allow for the containerization of rail<br />
cargo, an improvement in rolling stock and wagon availability, and<br />
greater automation that will improve transparency and reduce information<br />
asymmetries related to trade.<br />
Sea Transport<br />
Until recently, <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong> followed a very restrictive maritime<br />
protocol. The protocol allowed only <strong>India</strong>n and <strong>Pakistan</strong>i vessels to<br />
carry cargo between the two countries, and did not permit <strong>India</strong>n and<br />
<strong>Pakistan</strong>i vessels to send cargo destined to a third country from the ports<br />
of either country (in essence, <strong>India</strong> could not send cargo to a third country<br />
from <strong>Pakistan</strong>, and vice versa). This arrangement restricted competition<br />
from foreign vessels, and therefore resulted in high sea freight rates<br />
being charged by <strong>India</strong>n and <strong>Pakistan</strong>i vessels for cargo being shipped<br />
between the two countries. However, there was no restriction on the<br />
movement of transhipped cargo. Hence, several trading firms in <strong>India</strong><br />
and <strong>Pakistan</strong> transhipped their goods through Colombo. However, the<br />
protocol was amended in 2005, and as a result sea trade between the<br />
| 88 |