You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The <strong>Pakistan</strong>-<strong>India</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> Relationship: Prospects, Profits, and Pitfalls<br />
however, despite the resumption of ministerial-level talks in early 2011<br />
and a series of subsequent confidence-building measures, <strong>Pakistan</strong>-<strong>India</strong>n<br />
political relations remain deeply troubled. 6 Hostility is still entrenched in<br />
public sentiment; a Pew poll released in September 2012 finds majorities<br />
on each side viewing the other unfavorably, with <strong>India</strong>ns describing the<br />
<strong>Pakistan</strong>i state as more of a threat than the virulently anti-<strong>India</strong> Lashkare-Taiba<br />
militant group. 7 Many in Islamabad continue to regard <strong>India</strong> as<br />
an existential security threat that has never reconciled itself to <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s<br />
existence. New Delhi, meanwhile, remains angry about <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s refusal<br />
to pursue legal proceedings against the perpetrators of the 2008 Mumbai<br />
terror attacks, and is also anxious about <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s nuclear arsenal. Most<br />
critically, there has been no progress on resolving the territorial tensions<br />
that have triggered three wars between the two countries.<br />
Some observers, in fact, contend that Islamabad’s decision to liberalize<br />
trade with <strong>India</strong> could eventually produce great disillusionment in<br />
<strong>Pakistan</strong>, because <strong>India</strong> has no intention of making the territorial concessions,<br />
especially regarding Kashmir, that Islamabad hopes closer trade<br />
ties will eventually bring about. According to these observers, New<br />
Delhi sees stronger commercial relations as an end in themselves—and<br />
wishes that Islamabad would view trade ties in the same way. One analyst<br />
warns that by maintaining a rigid status-quo position on territorial<br />
issues, <strong>India</strong> “deprives itself of diplomatic flexibility, while also undermining<br />
the constituency for peace inside <strong>Pakistan</strong>.” 8<br />
Amin Hashwani offers a more optimistic perspective in this<br />
volume’s final contribution. Hashwani, a <strong>Pakistan</strong>i businessman and<br />
founder of the <strong>Pakistan</strong>-<strong>India</strong> CEOs Business Forum, insists that more<br />
trade truly can improve the bilateral relationship. In fact, he argues that a<br />
deep reservoir of goodwill is already well in place. “The positive chemistry<br />
that exists on a people-to-people level is unmatched and unprecedented,”<br />
he writes, underscoring the “warmth displayed for the other”<br />
on college campuses and in boardrooms in both countries. Additionally,<br />
he acknowledges that while <strong>India</strong>n perceptions of <strong>Pakistan</strong> tend to be<br />
“dimunitional and frequently quite negative” due to distorted media<br />
portrayals, he points out that <strong>Pakistan</strong>i writers and musicians have been<br />
making major inroads with <strong>India</strong>n audiences in recent years.<br />
<strong>Trade</strong> normalization, Hashwani argues, will tighten these links “and<br />
create many other unforeseen and unintended interdependencies.” He<br />
| 9 |