You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Kalpana Kochhar and Ejaz Ghani<br />
Most argue that trade potential between the two countries would<br />
be much higher than the current level if the large volume of informal<br />
and/or third-country trade were to be counted. The bottom line is that<br />
deeper engagement through normal bilateral trade would lead to significant<br />
welfare gains between the two countries.<br />
Our ongoing research has examined several scenarios on the gains<br />
from trade using a global computable general equilibrium (CGE) model<br />
and country dynamic CGE models (see De, Raihan, and Ghani 2012 for<br />
a detailed study). The CGE modelling framework of the Global <strong>Trade</strong><br />
Analysis Project (GTAP) (Hertel 1997) is a useful tool for examining the<br />
economic and trade consequences of multilateral or bilateral trade agreements.<br />
The GTAP model is a comparative static model, and uses a common<br />
global database for the CGE analysis. The model assumes perfect<br />
competition in all markets, constant returns to scale in all production<br />
and trade activities, and profit- and utility-maximizing behavior of firms<br />
and households, respectively. 3 Our research used UNCOMTRADE<br />
trade data (De, Raihan, and Ghani 2012 and Hertel 1997). While the<br />
alternative scenarios provide important insights, our research is still at an<br />
early stage, and much more analysis is needed.<br />
TWo <strong>Trade</strong> oPTions<br />
Two options that examine the benefits of trade policy liberalization and<br />
improvements in trade logistics are discussed below.<br />
Option 1: <strong>Pakistan</strong> gives MFN to <strong>India</strong> (with or without improvement in<br />
trade facilitation)<br />
In this first option, empirical simulations were based on two scenarios.<br />
In the first scenario, <strong>Pakistan</strong> gives MFN status to <strong>India</strong> without trade<br />
facilitation. Here, it is assumed that <strong>Pakistan</strong> extends MFN treatment to<br />
<strong>India</strong> by replacing its positive list with a negative list. The second scenario<br />
involves <strong>Pakistan</strong> extending MFN status to <strong>India</strong> and, in addition,<br />
there are improvements in trade facilitation between the two countries.<br />
In the second simulation, it is assumed that the transportation cost for<br />
bilateral trade in goods between <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong> will decrease by 25<br />
| 104 |