07.04.2013 Views

Gschwend%20thesis.pdf

Gschwend%20thesis.pdf

Gschwend%20thesis.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-50-<br />

and l49 (M+41) ions in the CH4 chemical ionization (CI) spectrum and m/e<br />

108 in the electron impact (El) spectrum (figure 2-8). Loss of l3<br />

and 27 mass units (giving m/e 95 and 81) in the CI spectrum indicates<br />

the presence of a terminal ethenyl group (Field, 1968), while loss of<br />

15 mass units (giving m/e 93) in both the EI and CI spectra suggests<br />

that there is a terminal methyl substituent also. Due to insufficient<br />

sample size, the remainder of the EI spectrum was largely uninter-<br />

pretable. Authentic trans ,cis-I, 3 ,5-octatriene and ethyl benzene<br />

CI spectra are also shown in figure 2-8. These spectra have all the<br />

same major fragment peaks as the unknown and èthyl benzene mixture in<br />

the sample. However, since this octatriene does not coelute with<br />

ethyl benzene, the unknown cannot be this particular isomer. Al though<br />

not all cyclic and branched structures can be ruled out, these data<br />

are consistent with a structure such as a straight chain octatriene.<br />

The GC peak heights of this unknown compound (ro 108) were estimated<br />

by subtracting assumed ethyl benzene peak heights from that of the<br />

mixed GC peak. The ethyl benzene peak heights were obtained by assuming<br />

that they were proportional to the peak heights of the other C2-benzene<br />

isomers. This was reasonable because ethyl benzene levels covary with<br />

the other C2-benzene isomer concentrations in most fossil fuels and<br />

environmental samples tested (chapter 4). These difference estimates<br />

agree well with predicted peak heights based on GCMS where data were<br />

available. The resultant spatial distribution of the concentration<br />

of this unknown compound (ro 108) is shown in figure 2-7. Maximum<br />

values were always found near the surface. Station 3 showed the<br />

highest level of all surface samples ând the concentrations decreased<br />

in the offshore direction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!