Annual Report 2008 in PDF - GKN
Annual Report 2008 in PDF - GKN
Annual Report 2008 in PDF - GKN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
11 Goodwill and other <strong>in</strong>tangible assets<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial Statements<br />
Notes to the F<strong>in</strong>ancial Statements<br />
<strong>2008</strong> 2007<br />
Goodwill £m £m<br />
Cost<br />
At 1 January 407 372<br />
Subsidiaries acquired — 30<br />
Currency variations 142 5<br />
At 31 December<br />
Accumulated impairment<br />
549 407<br />
At 1 January 127 127<br />
Currency variations 55 —<br />
At 31 December 182 127<br />
Net book amount at 31 December 367 280<br />
Comparative <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g cost and accumulated impairment has been re-presented to reclassify amortisation and impairment charges<br />
made under UK GAAP as cost. The net book amount is unchanged.<br />
The carry<strong>in</strong>g value of goodwill at 31 December comprised:<br />
<strong>2008</strong> 2007<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess segment Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Geographical location £m £m<br />
Drivel<strong>in</strong>e Driveshafts Americas 54 44<br />
Powder Metallurgy Hoeganaes North America 24 17<br />
OffHighway Wheels Italy 23 18<br />
Aerospace Aerostructures North America 35 25<br />
Propulsion Systems North America 93 67<br />
Propulsion Systems North America 42 30<br />
271 201<br />
Other bus<strong>in</strong>esses not <strong>in</strong>dividually significant to the carry<strong>in</strong>g value of goodwill 96 79<br />
367 280<br />
An impairment test is a comparison of the carry<strong>in</strong>g value of the assets of a bus<strong>in</strong>ess or cash generat<strong>in</strong>g unit (CGU) to their recoverable amount.<br />
Where the recoverable amount is less than the carry<strong>in</strong>g value, an impairment results. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the year, all goodwill was tested for impairment,<br />
with no impairment charges result<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
For the purposes of carry<strong>in</strong>g out impairment tests, the Group’s total goodwill has been allocated to a number of CGUs and each of these CGUs<br />
has been separately assessed and tested. The size of a CGU varies but is never larger than a primary or secondary reportable segment. In some<br />
cases, the CGU is an <strong>in</strong>dividual subsidiary or operation. The allocation of goodwill by bus<strong>in</strong>ess segment is set out <strong>in</strong> note 2.<br />
All of the recoverable amounts were measured based on value <strong>in</strong> use. Detailed forecasts for the next five years have been used <strong>in</strong> the majority<br />
of impairment tests except where a longer term more detailed forecast is available and appropriate. These forecasts are based on approved<br />
annual budgets and represent a best estimate of future performance.<br />
Key assumptions<br />
In determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the recoverable amount of all CGUs it is necessary to make a series of assumptions to estimate future cash flows. In each<br />
case, these key assumptions have been made by management reflect<strong>in</strong>g past experience and are consistent with relevant external sources of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
Operat<strong>in</strong>g cash flows<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> assumptions with<strong>in</strong> forecast operat<strong>in</strong>g cash flow <strong>in</strong>clude the achievement of future sales prices and volumes (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g reference to<br />
specific customer relationships, product l<strong>in</strong>es and the use of <strong>in</strong>dustry relevant external forecasts of global vehicle production with<strong>in</strong> Drivel<strong>in</strong>e<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses and consideration of specific volumes on certa<strong>in</strong> US military and civil programmes with<strong>in</strong> Aerospace), raw material <strong>in</strong>put costs, the<br />
cost structure of each CGU and the ability to realise benefits from annual productivity improvements, the impact of foreign exchange rates upon<br />
sell<strong>in</strong>g price and cost relationships and the levels of ongo<strong>in</strong>g capital expenditure required to support forecast production.<br />
www.gkn.com 97<br />
Restated