24.04.2013 Views

Sykes' History of Persia - Heritage Institute

Sykes' History of Persia - Heritage Institute

Sykes' History of Persia - Heritage Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

so HISTORY OF PERSIA chap.<br />

modern times, I now turn to Babylonia. As already<br />

explained, owing to the much greater northern extension<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Persia</strong>n Gulf and the more easterly course <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Euphrates, Babylonia was formerly <strong>of</strong> smaller extent than<br />

the study <strong>of</strong> a modern map would lead the student to<br />

suppose. On the north, the natural division was one<br />

between the dead level plain and the<br />

slightly undulating<br />

country, which would be represented by a line drawn from<br />

near Samarra on the Tigris to Hit on the Euphrates.<br />

On the east the Tigris was the boundary when Elam<br />

was strong ; but when Elam was weak Babylonia occu-<br />

pied fertile districts to the east <strong>of</strong> the river. On the west,<br />

the Euphrates was a natural boundary and defence ; and<br />

on the south lay the <strong>Persia</strong>n Gulf. Canon Rawlinson<br />

calculates the area as being rather less than that <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Netherlands.^<br />

Meaning <strong>of</strong> Sumer and Akkad.—Before proceeding<br />

farther it would seem desirable to explain the various<br />

terms used in connexion with this ancient country. At<br />

the very earliest period it was referred to simply as " The<br />

Land." At a later but still early period the name Sumer<br />

was applied to the district at the head <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Persia</strong>n Gulf,<br />

and Akkad was the neighbouring district to the north-<br />

east. There was no marked geographical or other division<br />

between the two countries :<br />

^ but Erech, Ur, Larsa, and<br />

Umma formed part <strong>of</strong> Sumer, which is referred to as the<br />

land <strong>of</strong> Shinar in the book <strong>of</strong> Genesis,^ the verse running,<br />

" And the beginning <strong>of</strong> his {sc. Nimrod's) kingdom was<br />

Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land <strong>of</strong><br />

Shinar." Akkad or Agade, on the other hand, had Sippar,<br />

within its boundaries.<br />

Kish, Babylon, and Borsippa<br />

Chaldea and — Babylonia. The term Chaldea ws<br />

formerly used in referring to this ancient land ; but, a?<br />

Rawlinson points out, the word is not found at all befor(<br />

the ninth century B.C., and then in Assyrian inscriptions.<br />

and its<br />

Consequently, owmg to the fame <strong>of</strong> Babylon<br />

comparative antiquity, it appears<br />

to be most convenient t<<br />

^<br />

Ancient Monarchies^ i. 6.<br />

2 Sumer and Akkad, p. 13.<br />

3 Genesis x. 10. Calneh may perhaps be Nippur. See also the quotation at tl<br />

head <strong>of</strong> this chapter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!