24.04.2013 Views

Sykes' History of Persia - Heritage Institute

Sykes' History of Persia - Heritage Institute

Sykes' History of Persia - Heritage Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 86 HISTORY OF PERSIA<br />

dice : but, as may be supposed, the kings who left everything<br />

to their ministers suffered from boredom, just as<br />

much as the modern pleasure seeker and we read <strong>of</strong> cases<br />

;<br />

in which carving or even planing wood was a royal dis-<br />

traction. Except for the listening to " the Book <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Chronicles <strong>of</strong> the Kings <strong>of</strong> <strong>Persia</strong> and Media " recorded<br />

in the book <strong>of</strong> Esther, no literature is mentioned, and it<br />

is unlikely that the monarchs could read or write. Since,<br />

however, we know that even Alfred the Great " could not<br />

write and perhaps could not read," ^ this ignorance is not<br />

extraordinary. Even to-day in <strong>Persia</strong> I have known men<br />

holding high positions who could neither read nor write,<br />

and, as their letters were not signed but sealed, their<br />

ignorance was by no means easily discovered.<br />

Below the King were the heads <strong>of</strong> the great families,<br />

known as the " Seven Princes," whose it<br />

right was to<br />

demand admission to the monarch's presence at any<br />

time, unless he were in the women's apartments. They<br />

frequently filled the great <strong>of</strong>fices and formed a permanent<br />

council. Below them, again, were the younger scions and<br />

adherents <strong>of</strong> the<br />

great families. The trading community<br />

was held in<br />

great contempt ; and consequently there was<br />

no intermediate class between the nobility and the com-<br />

monalty. A subject admitted to an audience prostrated<br />

himself on entering the presence and his hands remained<br />

hidden throughout. This custom still survives.^<br />

The Queen was supreme in the women's quarter.<br />

She had the right to wear the royal tiara and lorded itover<br />

the other wives. She possessed large revenues <strong>of</strong><br />

her own and a personal staffs <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials and servants.:<br />

When a woman <strong>of</strong> character filled the position, her<br />

influence was necessarily great, and to this history<br />

bears full evidence. The inferior wives, it would seem,<br />

had relatively little influence, and the hundreds <strong>of</strong> con-<br />

cubines, unless they attracted the monarch's special notice,<br />

shared the<br />

royal couch for only one night. The position<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Queen herself was liable to be overshadowed by<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the Queen-Mother, who took precedence and<br />

;<br />

^ The British Empire^ by Pr<strong>of</strong>essor A. F. Pollard, p. 23.<br />

2 when I first came to <strong>Persia</strong> I was surprised to see servants all standing with their<br />

arms crossed, until I learned that they were hiding their hands out <strong>of</strong> respect.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!