03.10.2012 Views

THE%20SINDH%20STORY

THE%20SINDH%20STORY

THE%20SINDH%20STORY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was gunned down at Ruk railway station --- and nobody was arrested. Sukkur<br />

district observed complete hartal for fifteen days. When Pamnani, MLA, said that<br />

the Pir of Bharchundi had got Kanwar Ram killed (earlier the Pir’s son had been<br />

beaten for kidnapping Hindu girls) he, too, was gunned down. The Sindh<br />

Hindus were stunned.<br />

But worse was to follow. Word went round that killing one Hindu was equal to<br />

doing seven Haj pilgrimages. Sixty-four Hindus were killed and property worth<br />

several million was looted or burnt in the Sukkur countryside. In this violent<br />

atmosphere, G.M. Syed said on the floor of the Assembly that the Hindus shall<br />

be driven out of Sindh like the Jews from Germany --- a statement he has very<br />

much regretted since. But the damage was done.<br />

It was a tragic situation, in which the Congress should have understood Allah<br />

Bux’s dilemma. Here was a man who had presided over the All-India Azad<br />

Conference in Delhi in 1940 and said: “The Muslims as a separate nation in India<br />

on the basis of their religion, is un-Islamic.” And the Congress should have<br />

understood why he had vacillated on the Manzilgah issue. As Gandhiji rightly<br />

pointed out in the Harijan (2 December, 1939), the basic problem was that selfadministration<br />

was new to Sindh. “Sindh is nominally autonomous and to that<br />

extent less able to protect life and property than the preceding government. For it<br />

has never had previous training in the Police or the Military arts.” But Congress<br />

joined hands with Muslim League to topple the Allah Bux ministry! (And when<br />

Khoso, the only Congress Muslim MLA, objected, he was expelled from the<br />

Party!) It was a great gift made by the Congressmen of Sindh to the Muslim<br />

League, two days before that party met in Lahore and adopted the Partition<br />

resolution on 25 March, 1940! The Muslim leaders have since freely admitted that<br />

the Manzilgah issue was a bogus (“hathradoo”) agitation, staged just to topple<br />

Allah Bux.<br />

Responsible Hindus were shocked by the short-sightedness of Sindh<br />

Congressmen. Professor N.R. Malkani wrote to Sardar Patel to do something<br />

about it. And the Sardar wrote back: “I have received your distressing letter of<br />

the 1st March 1940. Our friends of the Congress Assembly Party in Sindh have<br />

acted in a manner which has brought discredit to the organization and to<br />

themselves . . . The Hindu Panchayat of Sukkur has, it seems, succeeded in<br />

coercing them to a line of action which they would not have taken if they had the<br />

choice or the requisite courage to stand by the principles of the Congress . . .<br />

They talk of wider interest of the country in relation to their action, while they<br />

forget that they are not serving the local, much less the wider interest.”<br />

The League ministry fell the following year and Al]ah Bux came back to power.<br />

But the damage had been done. The Muslim League branches in Sindh went up<br />

The Sindh Story; Copyright © www.panhwar.com<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!