19.05.2013 Views

constitution of kenya review commission (ckrc ... - ConstitutionNet

constitution of kenya review commission (ckrc ... - ConstitutionNet

constitution of kenya review commission (ckrc ... - ConstitutionNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Government which has been in Kenya, have been working with it. They could not do anything in Meru, without consulting Njuri<br />

Ncheke. Our views as <strong>of</strong> now, are as follows about the ongoing Constitution.<br />

Our Constitution should have a preamble, so that we know the direction we are taking. About the Constitution itself, it must be<br />

flexible, that means, there are some legislature which cannot be passed by a Parliament. Some should be passed by Parliament<br />

and others must be so rigid that if they want to change it, they will have to go back to wananchi to ask them for a change.<br />

Kenya citizens should be a person whose both parents are Kenyanh citizens, and an I.D. alone is enough.<br />

Defence should be in the hands <strong>of</strong> the President, but in consultation with the Parliament and the Executive. If the President<br />

wants to declare any state <strong>of</strong> emergency or anything, he has to consult Parliament and they decide on what to do.<br />

Political parties should be funded or should be given aid by public funds, but that money should not be for campaining, but to<br />

run their <strong>of</strong>fices. Political parties should have airtime, good airtime all <strong>of</strong> them, because now we hear only <strong>of</strong> one party and<br />

others we do not hear any <strong>of</strong> the others on the public media.<br />

Structure <strong>of</strong> the Government: – We should have a Government where power is shared by other organs, like say, the County<br />

Council, if we elevate it and give it good people to run it. There is no need <strong>of</strong> having one man at the top, controlling or directing<br />

every action in the country. That one, you will know how to say it, but we do not want a government <strong>of</strong> one man telling all <strong>of</strong> us<br />

what to do, appointing any person he wants to appoint, and dismissing any person he wants to dismiss.<br />

The following <strong>of</strong>fices should have a security <strong>of</strong> tenure so that one is not dismissed any time he has got friction with “the big<br />

man”:-<br />

Judges, Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Public Service Commission, Permanent Secretaries, Chairman <strong>of</strong> Anti-Corruption, Director <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Prosecution, the Controller and Auditor General, Governor <strong>of</strong> Central Bank, Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Lands, Chairman, - Electoral<br />

Commision, Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Police, Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Prisons and somebody you have initiated to call ombudsman. I think<br />

one Mzee talked about it here. We don’t know where to take our problems and we thought ombudsman, if things go wrong<br />

we can consult him. Those people should be appointed by Parliament or sanctioned by Parliament, and to dismiss them, the<br />

Parliament must approve their dismissal. The reasons should be given to Parliament saying that this man is not fit.<br />

About political MPs, I think for the MPs, our view is that he should vote according to his conviction, not what he is instructed<br />

by his Party to do. He must be convinced that what he is doing is the right thing.<br />

Com Lenaola: You give your last point.<br />

Julius Mworia: Last point?<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!