WOE UNTO YOU, LAWYERS!
WOE UNTO YOU, LAWYERS!
WOE UNTO YOU, LAWYERS!
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
involved to be recounted here, that the original Constitution forbade Congress to tax<br />
citizens’ incomes.<br />
It was under the Court’s “interpretation” of what the interstate commerce<br />
clause did not mean that such New Deal laws as the National Industrial Recovery<br />
Act and the Guffey Coal Act met their death. It seems there are two principles. One<br />
is that Congress may regulate anything that affects interstate commerce directly.<br />
The other is that Congress may not regulate anything that affects interstate<br />
commerce only indirectly. Of course, there is not a word in the Constitution itself<br />
about direct or indirect effects on interstate commerce but that does not keep those<br />
effects from being a very vital consideration in Constitutional Law.<br />
Applying these principles, the Court said that working conditions in<br />
companies doing interstate business affected interstate commerce only indirectly.<br />
So it was perfectly apparent that the N.I.R.A. and the Guffey Coal Act, both of<br />
which made bold to regulate those working conditions, were downright<br />
unconstitutional. But by the time the Wagner Labor Act came along a couple of<br />
years later, working conditions in companies doing interstate business had suddenly<br />
acquired a direct effect on interstate commerce, and so a law regulating those<br />
conditions was perfectly constitutional. The relevant principles of Constitutional<br />
Law remained, of course, unchanged. It was merely that, this time, a different<br />
principle was “controlling.”<br />
There was, moreover, a second reason why the N.I.R.A. was unconstitutional<br />
– for the Court is not always content to kill a law with one shot of Constitutional<br />
principle. The second reason is especially interesting because it involves one of<br />
those chunks of Constitutional Law that is not even remotely derived from anything<br />
written in the document that most people think of as the Constitution. The Court just<br />
made this up all by itself.<br />
The basic principle that the Court made up is that Congress may not delegate<br />
or hand over any of its lawmaking power to anyone else. Now it is clear that if this<br />
principle were really followed there wouldn’t be any United States government. All<br />
the thousands of rules and regulations and orders, little laws every one of them, that<br />
are formulated day after day by every branch of the government – by the<br />
commissions, like the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal Trade<br />
Commission, by the departments, all ten of them, and by the branches and bureaus of<br />
the departments, like the Patent Office and the Coast Guard and the rest – all these<br />
rules and regulations would have to be passed by Congress itself. It is only because<br />
Congress has always delegated the largest part of its lawmaking power, after laying<br />
down the broad, general outlines of a law, that the federal government has been able<br />
to function at all.<br />
40