06.06.2013 Views

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

23.8 PSO 4000 requires management monitoring <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> IEP scheme.<br />

A member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Senior Management Team must carry out monthly checks <strong>of</strong> a sample<br />

<strong>of</strong> review decisions to ensure fairness and consistency and provide advice and guidance<br />

on report writing and decision making as necessary. Figures relating to <strong>the</strong> scheme must<br />

be produced annually for <strong>the</strong> Senior Management Team and Race Equality Action<br />

Team.<br />

Monitoring prison performance<br />

23.9 Mr Vince gave evidence to <strong>the</strong> inquiry about ways in which Manchester Prison<br />

and its staff are held to account and arrangements in place to promote fair treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

prisoners.<br />

23.10 Manchester Prison operates under a Service Level Agreement. A compliance<br />

monitor, who is independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prison, reports on <strong>the</strong> prison’s performance to <strong>the</strong><br />

Prison Service Contracts and Competitions Unit. Periodic inspection by <strong>the</strong> national<br />

Standards Audit Unit rates compliance with Prison Service Standards and <strong>the</strong> prison<br />

also conducts self-audits. Impact assessments, including prisoner consultation and<br />

evaluation by <strong>the</strong> prison’s Diversity Team, are conducted on all new policies and<br />

procedures.<br />

23.11 Mr Vince described <strong>the</strong> various ways in which prisoners can communicate<br />

concerns. These included: confidential letter to <strong>the</strong> Governor, <strong>the</strong> Chair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Independent Monitoring Board, <strong>the</strong> Area Manager or a solicitor; telling a member <strong>of</strong> staff;<br />

contacting <strong>the</strong> Prisoners’ Helpline; through regular focus groups; speaking with a<br />

Listener or Insider (both are prisoners’ peer support schemes); putting a note in <strong>the</strong> mail<br />

box. Complaints may be made through <strong>the</strong> internal complaints procedure and to <strong>the</strong><br />

Independent Monitoring Board and <strong>the</strong> Prisons and Probation Ombudsman. Prisoners<br />

are made aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se channels during induction, and all received a comprehensive<br />

induction information booklet.<br />

23.12 The prison takes part in <strong>the</strong> research measuring <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> prison life (<strong>the</strong><br />

MQPL Survey – see paragraph 17.15 above). A survey <strong>of</strong> prisoners takes place over<br />

four days every two years. The aim is to make comparisons between similar prisons to<br />

identify examples <strong>of</strong> good practice and to improve prisons generally.<br />

169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!