06.06.2013 Views

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

though he was convinced that he had referred to <strong>the</strong> observation book and not Mr<br />

Lodge’s personal record. He said he might also have got information from o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r reason for searching Mr Lodge’s cell was that he was conveniently available,<br />

being on ‘bang-up’ during <strong>the</strong> association period.<br />

9.29 In oral evidence to <strong>the</strong> inquest Mr Bowcock said that he could see that Mr<br />

Lodge’s cell had not been searched within <strong>the</strong> month. The records show this was<br />

incorrect.<br />

9.30 Mr Bowcock told <strong>the</strong> inquiry that he could not be sure whe<strong>the</strong>r he had looked at<br />

<strong>the</strong> history sheets but his recollection was that <strong>the</strong> main reason for selecting Mr Lodge<br />

was that he had had a visit. In his statement, he said that he could “categorically state<br />

that <strong>the</strong> entry in <strong>the</strong> record [about an assault on Officer Brownley] did not in any way<br />

provide <strong>the</strong> motivation for <strong>the</strong> decision to search Mr Lodge’s cell. I do not remember<br />

reading that particular entry.”<br />

SO Nuttall’s evidence<br />

9.31 SO Nuttall told <strong>the</strong> inquiry that when he came on duty in <strong>the</strong> evening staff were<br />

already detailed to particular duties and Officers Bowcock and Downs told him <strong>the</strong>y<br />

would start routine cell searching. He said <strong>the</strong>y did not say which cells were to be<br />

searched. He would have expected <strong>the</strong>m to do so only if <strong>the</strong> search was because <strong>of</strong><br />

security information or immediate grounds for concern such as a smell <strong>of</strong> cannabis<br />

coming from a cell.<br />

9.32 SO Nuttall said that he did not look at <strong>the</strong> wing observation book when he took<br />

over <strong>the</strong> wing but relied on an oral handover from <strong>the</strong> outgoing senior <strong>of</strong>ficer to alert him<br />

to any problems.<br />

The records<br />

9.33 Mr Bowcock wrote <strong>the</strong> cell number, Mr Lodge’s name and prison number and his<br />

own name in <strong>the</strong> excess searching sheet. He did not enter <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Mr Lodge’s<br />

cellmate, or Mr Downs’ name; <strong>the</strong> entry was not signed and no result was entered. The<br />

details would normally have been completed at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> search. In his statement to<br />

<strong>the</strong> police, Mr Bowcock said that he did not complete <strong>the</strong> entry that evening because <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> incident after <strong>the</strong> search and when he looked for <strong>the</strong> book to complete <strong>the</strong> record <strong>the</strong><br />

next day it was gone.<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!