06.06.2013 Views

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

said about him and protests that he is not guilty. He says he has been “grassed up<br />

bigtime” before “but never stitched up like this”.<br />

Wednesday 26 August: Ms A telephones again<br />

8.12 Ms A telephoned <strong>the</strong> prison again on Wednesday and left a message on <strong>the</strong><br />

chaplain’s answerphone. She would not have received Sonny’s letter from Tuesday<br />

evening at that point. The message was picked up by Ms Lorimer, who was duty<br />

chaplain for <strong>the</strong> day.<br />

8.13 Ms Lorimer had come across Sonny Lodge before. She was Chair <strong>of</strong> a day<br />

centre he had sometimes attended in Manchester and said she knew him vaguely by<br />

sight. When Mr Lodge was in Manchester prison, <strong>the</strong> manager <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day centre, Ms<br />

Stanway, visited him and asked Ms Lorimer to visit in her capacity as an assistant<br />

chaplain. Ms Lorimer said Ms Stanway felt that Sonny Lodge was suicidal after <strong>the</strong><br />

hospital incident. Ms Stanway said she visited him on or about 4 August and this<br />

prompted her to ask Ms Lorimer to see him. A letter from Mr Lodge refers to Ms Stanway<br />

visiting on 5 August. However, Ms Lorimer told <strong>the</strong> inquest that her diary indicated she<br />

visited Mr Lodge on 15 July.<br />

8.14 Ms Lorimer has recently provided additional information at <strong>the</strong> inquiry’s request.<br />

She said that when she visited Mr Lodge on this first occasion she was aware from Ms<br />

Stanway that he had previously self-harmed but not that he had attempted suicide. They<br />

had a conversation <strong>of</strong> about 12 minutes. Mr Lodge did not want to talk longer. He<br />

appeared resigned to serving his sentence. His mood seemed flat but he made no<br />

reference to being suicidal or to any bullying or violence and he did not talk about <strong>the</strong><br />

incident with <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficer. Ms Lorimer said she did not try to force him to discuss matters<br />

he was not ready to disclose. She was a trained and experienced counsellor and<br />

commented that it was a principle <strong>of</strong> counselling that, whilst recognising <strong>the</strong> need to<br />

identify risk, it is important to respect an individual’s need for privacy. Ms Lorimer said<br />

she did not check at <strong>the</strong> time whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re was an open F2052SH for Mr Lodge. If she<br />

had known that <strong>the</strong>re was an F2052SH she would have made a note in it. At <strong>the</strong> inquest,<br />

Ms Lorimer said she was not aware that Mr Lodge had been on F2052SH at<br />

Manchester.<br />

8.15 Ms Lorimer recalled that in reply to <strong>the</strong> message on 26 August she telephoned<br />

Ms A who told her that Mr Lodge was depressed and low and wanted one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!