Freedom and Death Inside the Jail.pdf - The Action Program for ...
Freedom and Death Inside the Jail.pdf - The Action Program for ...
Freedom and Death Inside the Jail.pdf - The Action Program for ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
72<br />
<strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Death</strong> <strong>Inside</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Jail</strong><br />
Table 4.12 : Length of Stay of Quezon City <strong>Jail</strong> Inmates as of October 2003<br />
Inmates also complain about <strong>the</strong>ir hearings being scheduled<br />
months apart. <strong>The</strong>y say that, on <strong>the</strong> average, <strong>the</strong>y get a hearing only<br />
once every two months. For some inmates, it takes four months.<br />
Worse, some hearings get cancelled <strong>and</strong> re-scheduled after two or<br />
four months. A hearing is called off <strong>for</strong> a myriad of reasons: <strong>the</strong><br />
judge, prosecutor, or lawyer is sick or has o<strong>the</strong>r commitments; <strong>the</strong><br />
witnesses fail to appear because <strong>the</strong>y did not receive <strong>the</strong> notice of<br />
hearing; <strong>the</strong>re is no more time left since <strong>the</strong> preceding case that<br />
was heard took a lot of time; <strong>the</strong> scheduled date of hearing has<br />
been proclaimed a public holiday; <strong>the</strong>re is a typhoon; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re<br />
are security concerns in <strong>the</strong> jail, like riots <strong>and</strong> noise barrages.<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r reason cited by inmates as to why <strong>the</strong>ir cases get<br />
delayed is that most of <strong>the</strong> courts issue a decision well beyond<br />
<strong>the</strong> 90-day period set by law. Most of <strong>the</strong> cases are decided upon<br />
within a span of six months to one year. <strong>The</strong>re are even cases that<br />
are promulgated five years after <strong>the</strong>y were submitted.<br />
Sometimes, <strong>the</strong> delay is intentional. Arresting officers deliberately<br />
do not attend <strong>the</strong> hearings knowing that a case would<br />
be provisionally dismissed only if <strong>the</strong>y do not appear <strong>for</strong> three<br />
consecutive sessions. <strong>The</strong> usual practice is that <strong>the</strong>y intentionally<br />
do not attend <strong>the</strong> first two hearings, wait <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> rescheduling of<br />
<strong>the</strong> third hearing, <strong>and</strong> that is <strong>the</strong> time that <strong>the</strong>y will attend. Which<br />
means <strong>the</strong> first two had already been postponed. Continuing <strong>the</strong><br />
pattern, <strong>the</strong>y will not attend <strong>the</strong> fourth <strong>and</strong> fifth hearings, which<br />
will again be postponed. It is only on <strong>the</strong> sixth scheduled hearing<br />
that <strong>the</strong>y will attend again. For every three hearings scheduled,