18.06.2013 Views

January-February - Air Defense Artillery

January-February - Air Defense Artillery

January-February - Air Defense Artillery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40<br />

marines to ci\'ilian life. The existence of different point<br />

systems, of different methods for operating separation procedures<br />

at different installations and the uncorrelated demands<br />

upon the nation's transportation system are today<br />

an indication of the disadvantages which arise when two<br />

different and independent oroanizations are carrvino on<br />

o . 0<br />

demobilization simultaneouslv.<br />

ORGAl''lZATIONAL PREPAREDNESS-CoMBINED TRAINING<br />

Prior to \Vorld \\Tar II there was little teamwork between<br />

the Army and Navy insofar as actual preparations for combined<br />

operations were concerned, although all the Am1Y's<br />

war plans called for landinos on foreion shores. Not until<br />

o 0<br />

war arrived was there any appreciable joint training in amphibious<br />

operations.<br />

The value of thorough training in combined operations<br />

was demonstrated forcefully in the Normandy landinos<br />

, ,0<br />

where there was the closest cooperation. Training for this<br />

gigantic assault was organized and carried on in England<br />

during the months of preparation after the war began. A<br />

future war may not giye our armed forces time for such<br />

transitional training and joint preparation. Certainly the<br />

nation should not count on any such period but should provide<br />

a system whereby adequate combined training can be<br />

perfected during the years of peace.<br />

The \\Tar Department believes that a single department<br />

can best produce and administer an integrated training program,<br />

conduct joint training activities, and permit officers<br />

to be assigned in such a way that an individual officer will<br />

have an understanding of other Services besides the one in<br />

which he has specialized. It is a safe assumption that without<br />

unified direction-and specific appropriations to make combined<br />

training possible-each service will revert to its former<br />

practice of concentrating on the training and development of<br />

specialists in its own type of warfare. Thus joint training<br />

and operations would assume a minor role in the postwar<br />

military establishment, and there would be danger that the<br />

nation would repeat the mistake of training separate units to<br />

be committed to combat as a hastily organized team.<br />

ORGANIZATION OF THE THREE MAJOR COl\IPONENTS<br />

The unification plan establishes the three components,<br />

Army, Navy and <strong>Air</strong>, as coequal members of a .single department.<br />

Each would be headed by a commander who<br />

THE COAST ARTILLERY JOllRNAL Jmlllar)'-Fe<br />

would be responsible for the internal organization and<br />

duct of his service, and for the organization, develop<br />

and training of the military elements under his directi<br />

1. The <strong>Air</strong> Force should include all land-based co<br />

aircraft except those allotted to the Arm)' and ,<br />

for reconnaissance. spotting of gunfire, command<br />

messenger service. The <strong>Air</strong> would retain its own<br />

cialized service forces.<br />

2. The Army should include all combat ground I'<br />

other than the 1\ larioe Corps and would ha\'e its<br />

specialized service forces.<br />

3. The Naw should include the United States Fleet<br />

its air an;), the 1\ larine Corps. and its own special<br />

service forces.<br />

Eflicient conduct of operations requires that each<br />

ponent retain its own specialized service forces. This m<br />

for example, that the Navy would construct its own<br />

and would supply and evacuate its own combat perso<br />

The Arm)' would maintain its own repair facilities in<br />

field for tanks, trucks and like equipment. The <strong>Air</strong> F<br />

would have a complement of ground crews for mainten<br />

repair and service of planes. There will always be a nee<br />

such special service forces, particularly with the co<br />

echelons of the three major components. However. as<br />

single department accumulated experience, many com<br />

services and functions could oraduallv be shifted to th<br />

o ,<br />

rector of Common Supply. Such consolidations would e<br />

substantial savings in money and could be accompli<br />

without interfering with the efficient development of f<br />

tions that should rightly be retained by the individual<br />

ponents.<br />

\Vith regard to overseas theater and area commanders<br />

\Var Department believes that the system of unity of<br />

mand which assured the coordination of the efforts of I<br />

sea and air forces in the field should be continued. Th<br />

commanders who served in the past war were named b)<br />

President on the recommendations of the Joint Chie<br />

Staff. They operated under directives prepared by the<br />

Chiefs and approved by the President. The \Var De<br />

ment feels that there always should be one top comma<br />

in each theater and that this commander should owe his<br />

allegiance directly to the President rather than to any<br />

component of the armed forces.<br />

Anything that is wrong with equipment should be<br />

remedied as quickly as possible. The longer you let a<br />

defect go-even though it may be a very minor one-the<br />

worse the damage it will do, and the harder it will be<br />

to fix it in the end.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!