18.06.2013 Views

January-February - Air Defense Artillery

January-February - Air Defense Artillery

January-February - Air Defense Artillery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

"\'lindow" off the Secret List<br />

Narro\\" strips of metal foil cut in lengths corresponding<br />

the frequencies of enemy radar and released from<br />

bers o\'er Gemlanv are estimated to have reduced Alplane<br />

losses by 7) per cent. the \Var Department has<br />

d.<br />

Known as chaff ("window." to AA men). this metal foil<br />

oonsidered to ha\'e been one of the most effective devices<br />

the Radar Countermeasures Program, according to the<br />

n) Signal Corps. Ten million pounds of chaff were<br />

roped in the air over Germany during the bombardment<br />

the Reich. Chaff was used by American and British<br />

lbers to paralyze the enemy's antiaircraft fire control by<br />

uttering" the scopes of the German radar. Packages of<br />

foil. released from planes, gave the same resp0l1se on<br />

mlan radar that would be caused by bombers.<br />

Chaff was only one of many kinds of equipment emved<br />

bv the Allies as radar countermeasures. "Jammers,"<br />

~isting of high-powcred radio transmitters, were effec-<br />

\'C in blacking out German radar sets used by the enemy<br />

locatc Allied planes and ships, to direct German fighters,<br />

to point their deadly flak-firing artillery.<br />

From the time the first radar sets for detecting enemy<br />

raft were first devised, it was evident that radar, like<br />

dio communications, would be susceptible to enemy inrference.<br />

An early directive stipulated that the first longnge<br />

radar detector should not be subject to interference,<br />

t the Signal Corps reports that up to the present it has<br />

cn impossible to design any radio or radar that is free<br />

om jamming. In the battle for supremacy in the radar<br />

eld, the Allies emerged victorious because they were able<br />

~ ... ..<br />

..<br />

" ,~<br />

... ...<br />

" • ..<br />

•<br />

.. ,<br />

0-'E\\'S A;\D CO~I~tE;\T<br />

~., . . ..<br />

..~: ..<br />

...<br />

...<br />

.-..<br />

•<br />

.. \.<br />

81<br />

to keep ahead of the enen1\' with countermeasure equipment.<br />

The British used some jamming devices before the United<br />

States entered the war. \ Vith these thev were able to black<br />

out German coastal early-warning and 'gun-laying radar installations<br />

on the French coast. They hit upon the idea of<br />

dropping strips of metal foil as a radar shield for their<br />

planes, a device they called "window." The foil was pasted<br />

on paper to givc it rigidity. but had limited production.<br />

The U. S. Army Signal Corps took up the idea, and with<br />

the aid of the National <strong>Defense</strong> Research Committee, experimented<br />

with different sizes of foil. By crimpling the<br />

thin metal strips, it was possible to reduce the weight to<br />

one-fourth with no loss of effectiveness. Thereafter, both<br />

Britain and the U. S. depended upon the American suppl~',<br />

l' l' l'<br />

Biological W'arfare<br />

It is important to note that. unlike the development .of<br />

the atomic bomb and other secret weapons during the war,<br />

the development of agents for biological warfare is possible<br />

in many countries, large and small, without vast expenditures<br />

of money or the construction of huge production<br />

facilities. It is clear that the development of biological warfare<br />

could very well proceed in many countries, perhaps<br />

under the guise of legitimate medical or bacteriological research.<br />

In whatever deliberations that take place concerning the<br />

implementation of a lasting peace in the world, the potentialities<br />

of biological warfare cannot safely be ignored.-<br />

From tIle report to the Secretar)' of 'Var by Mr. George W.<br />

l''lerck .<br />

~.,',\ ~~ ,~<br />

, -<br />

. British Official<br />

II," the British Navy's experimental anti-V-l rocket battery. "Tonsil" was a rush job---ordered on 11 July 1944, the<br />

ers were mounted on trucks in two days. ready for action in four days. and by 31 July had accounted for eight V-Is.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!