Design and Voltage Supply of High-Speed Induction - Aaltodoc
Design and Voltage Supply of High-Speed Induction - Aaltodoc
Design and Voltage Supply of High-Speed Induction - Aaltodoc
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8 CIRCULATORY CURRENTS IN A STATOR WINDING<br />
The difference between the electromagnetic power loss measured <strong>and</strong> calculated in Section 7.3 was<br />
disturbing. The difference seemed to be a function <strong>of</strong> the input current or load <strong>of</strong> the high-speed<br />
induction motor. At the nominal operation point, the model used in the calculations underestimated<br />
the loss by almost 20%. This raises questions about the usability <strong>of</strong> the model in designing <strong>and</strong><br />
optimization <strong>of</strong> the high-speed machines.<br />
Circulatory currents in the filamentary stator windings were suspected as a possible reason for the<br />
difference in the results. These currents can flow in parallel str<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> paths <strong>of</strong> a filamentary<br />
conductor winding. This would mean an increased loss in a stator winding. The loss component<br />
would be a function <strong>of</strong> current in the same way as is the discrepancy in the results <strong>of</strong> comparison<br />
mentioned above. Thus, the high-speed motor in question was disassembled for the measurement <strong>of</strong><br />
the possible circulatory current effect. Fig. 8.1 shows the stator prepared for the measurement.<br />
The reason for the circulatory currents is the magnetic flux penetrating the windings inside the<br />
stator slots. The flux causes eddy currents that change the current density distribution in the parallel<br />
str<strong>and</strong>s. The amplitude <strong>and</strong> the phase angle <strong>of</strong> the currents in parallel conductors are different from<br />
each other.<br />
In the FEM model used, the current density in the stator winding is assumed to be constant. The<br />
eddy-current loss is modeled separately from the field solution by using Eq. A11. Thus, the<br />
circulatory currents in the parallel str<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> paths <strong>of</strong> the filamentary winding are not modeled. In<br />
order to model the filamentary winding precisely, every individual str<strong>and</strong> should have its own<br />
voltage equation (Eq. A3) solved together with the field solution. Doing this kind <strong>of</strong> model is<br />
difficult. Every str<strong>and</strong> should be meshed in detail. As there can be thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> str<strong>and</strong>s in the stator<br />
winding, the size <strong>of</strong> the model may become unfeasibly difficult to solve. Using macro elements as<br />
described by Szücs (2001) could decrease this size <strong>of</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> equations.<br />
Even if solving the modeling problem is possible, one problem remains. The positions <strong>of</strong> the str<strong>and</strong>s<br />
inside the slot <strong>of</strong> a manufactured machine are not known. Accurate <strong>and</strong> correct positioning <strong>of</strong><br />
str<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a filamentary winding is considered expensive <strong>and</strong> time-consuming, if not impossible.<br />
This difference between modeling <strong>and</strong> reality will inherently generate a difference in calculated <strong>and</strong><br />
measured results for the stator winding loss.<br />
89