29.06.2013 Views

Central Falls Transformation Report - Annenberg Institute for School ...

Central Falls Transformation Report - Annenberg Institute for School ...

Central Falls Transformation Report - Annenberg Institute for School ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

When asked about how advisory could be improved, a CFHS leadership team member<br />

indicated that changes to the structure of advisory are planned <strong>for</strong> next year. First, the<br />

schedule will eliminate advisory from taking place during lunch periods. Next, the length<br />

of advisory periods will be extended from twenty-two minutes to “close to an hour.” These<br />

scheduling changes will enable advisory to be better monitored <strong>for</strong> fidelity to the objectives.<br />

The leadership team member elaborated on future plans <strong>for</strong> the advisory program:<br />

It’s something structured and built into the schedule, but the concept behind advisory<br />

is that personalization can happen in different ways. I would like to the see the<br />

future of advisories become more small group-oriented and more inclusive of staff<br />

throughout the building so that all staff from the custodians to the secretaries are<br />

being advisors to students.<br />

Student Perceptions of Advisory<br />

Students described advisory as a school-wide, non-graded requirement <strong>for</strong> all pupils<br />

enrolled at CFHS. Students explained that teacher-advisors changed each year. They<br />

expressed an interest in maintaining the same advisor throughout the four years of high<br />

school. Advisory activities varied, according to students. For example, one student compared<br />

it to study hall sessions while another student spoke about engaging in open discussions<br />

and playing games about school-related topics.<br />

Positive aspects of advisory included the sense that “everyone got along,” which created<br />

a space <strong>for</strong> open discussions. Students also spoke positively about their advisors and<br />

described their personalities as “friendly,” “understanding,” and “nice.” Negative aspects of<br />

the program included criticisms that there were too many rules and it created too strict an<br />

environment. Another student said they liked very little about advisory other than the<br />

snacks that were provided and wished they had more time to work on their portfolios during<br />

the school year.<br />

When asked about suggestions that would make advisory better in the years to come, students<br />

mentioned two specific recommendations: “I think we should have the same advisory<br />

teacher throughout our high school experience,” and “Ask us what we want to talk<br />

about; make us pick the topic.”<br />

7 Please see Appendix D <strong>for</strong> a complete listing of all responses to this staff survey question on advisory.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!