29.06.2013 Views

Central Falls Transformation Report - Annenberg Institute for School ...

Central Falls Transformation Report - Annenberg Institute for School ...

Central Falls Transformation Report - Annenberg Institute for School ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Staff Survey Question: Do you feel per<strong>for</strong>mance management activities have been beneficial to teachers<br />

this year? Why or why not? Please provide examples of the ways per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

activities have or have not been beneficial.<br />

Teachers (n=36 teachers: 35 responses*; 1 blank)<br />

Other Staff (n=7 other staff: 7 responses*)<br />

30. This was a year of finger pointing and dismissive toward the teachers. I personally received<br />

absolutely no support, training or positive feedback the entire year. Comments too often<br />

related to other issues than they were supposed to measure, making it obvious that per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

assessment was not the focus.<br />

31. This was beneficial because it <strong>for</strong>ced clear thinking when planning instruction. The evaluation<br />

was an outside judgment provided a point of reference <strong>for</strong> improving instruction...it was a<br />

chance to reflect on effectiveness and ways to improve.<br />

32. Yes<br />

33. Yes and No<br />

34. Yes, the resources and collaboration with evaluators, was very helpful.<br />

35. Yes, they have provided teachers with growth opportunities.<br />

1. I think the activities have been good. They are concrete and easily understood. they support the<br />

initiative <strong>for</strong> data collecting.<br />

2. It created a “toxic” and highly stressful work environment. If evaluations were not good, there<br />

was no corrective action plan in place <strong>for</strong> the teacher to improve. They just said that they can<br />

find someone better “out there”<br />

3. Somewhat, some teachers have used in<strong>for</strong>mation to improve practice<br />

4. Unknown<br />

5. Yes, per<strong>for</strong>mance management activities have led to increased accountability <strong>for</strong> all; relative to<br />

student achievement and success. Imbedded in these activities is a system of support as well.<br />

6. Yes. It provided clear expectations and systematic feedback.<br />

7. Yes. Teachers have received direct feedback on the 4 domains <strong>for</strong> improvement. More periodic<br />

communications among evaluators and teachers needed.<br />

* For the purpose of improved clarity, spelling errors have been corrected without changing the phrase content or meaning. Capitalization,<br />

grammar, and punctuation have been preserved.<br />

80 <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> High <strong>School</strong> FIRST YEAR TRANSFORMATION REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!