03.07.2013 Views

Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest

Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest

Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ecommendations. In terms <strong>of</strong> economic significance, when the Conflict Discuss Neg variable<br />

changes from being positive or neutral to being negative, the probability <strong>of</strong> a sell<br />

recommendation increases by about 6.1%. For our control variables, we find that longer reports<br />

are associated with more positive recommendations. For the bonds <strong>of</strong> firms on a rating agency’s<br />

positive watch list, analysts are more likely to issue positive recommendations, consistent with<br />

an expected improvement in a firm’s credit quality. An untabulated χ 2 -statistic indicates that the<br />

rating fixed effects are jointly statistically significant.<br />

In the second column, we estimate Equation 1 but use recommendation revisions (Δ<strong>Debt</strong><br />

Recommendation) as the dependent variable instead <strong>of</strong> recommendation levels. This sample is<br />

limited to observations in which a recommendation change or the previous recommendation<br />

level is provided in the report. In this specification, the coefficient on Conflict Discuss Neg is<br />

negative and statistically significant, as expected. Hence, when debt analysts view conflict events<br />

as negative, they are less likely to revise their recommendations upwards. In terms <strong>of</strong> control<br />

variables, the positive coefficient on the variable On Watch Pos indicates that debt analysts are<br />

more likely to upgrade when bonds are placed on a rating agency’s positive watch list.<br />

In the third column, using the same set <strong>of</strong> explanatory variables, we predict the<br />

disagreement between debt and equity analysts’ recommendations. The dependent variable is the<br />

debt analyst’s recommendation less the most recent equity analyst’s recommendation issued for<br />

the same firm in the 21-trading-day window before the debt analyst report. Of the 7,035<br />

observations used in this test, 4,107 represent a recommendation disagreement between debt and<br />

equity analysts. We find that the coefficient on Conflict Discuss Neg is negative and statistically<br />

significant, indicating that when debts analysts have negative discussions about conflict events,<br />

they are more likely to issue more negative recommendations than are equity analysts. This<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!