03.07.2013 Views

Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest

Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest

Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TABLE 9<br />

Alternative measure <strong>of</strong> the tone <strong>of</strong> debt analysts’ conflict discussions<br />

This table presents results for two alternative measures <strong>of</strong> our main variable, the tone <strong>of</strong> debt analysts’ negative<br />

conflict discussions. The alternative measures are based on the disagreement in the tone <strong>of</strong> conflict discussions<br />

between debt and equity analyst reports. We extract equity analysts’ discussions <strong>of</strong> conflict events from a matched<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> equity analysts’ reports and measure the discussions’ tone using the Naïve-Bayesian model. Our<br />

alternative hybrid measure <strong>of</strong> debt analysts’ conflict discussions focuses on debt analysts’ reports that contain<br />

negative conflict discussions when equity analysts’ conflict discussions are positive. Alternative Measure #1 uses<br />

the training data set from debt analysts’ reports (used in our main analysis) to estimate the equity analysts’ Naïve-<br />

Bayesian model. Alternative Measure #2 uses a new training data set based directly on equity analysts’ conflict<br />

discussions. The first column repeats the respective main result from Tables 5 to 8 as a benchmark for comparison.<br />

The next two columns present the results using identical tests but with one <strong>of</strong> the two alternative measures: only the<br />

coefficient and t-statistic (or z-statistic) <strong>of</strong> the main variable are tabulated. All specifications are estimated with the<br />

same set <strong>of</strong> other independent variables as the previously tabulated tests, but the results for these variables are not<br />

tabulated. ***, **, and * denote significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively, using two-tailed tests. All<br />

variables are defined in Appendix 1.<br />

Main Measure Alternative Alternative<br />

(For Comparison) Measure #1 Measure #2<br />

Variable Prediction (1) (2) (3)<br />

From Table 5, Column (1), Dep. Var. = <strong>Debt</strong> Recommendation<br />

Conflict Discuss Neg – -0.295*** -0.174** -0.254***<br />

[-6.57] [-2.60] [-4.09]<br />

From Table 6, Column (2), Dep. Var. = ΔCDS Spread<br />

Conflict Discuss Neg × <strong>Equity</strong> Return + 2.729** 4.365*** 2.806<br />

[2.11] [3.05] [1.51]<br />

From Table 7, Column (1), Dep. Var. = Bond Volume<br />

Conflict Discuss Neg + 0.220*** 0.111** 0.156***<br />

[5.93] [2.29] [3.94]<br />

From Table 8, Column (1), Dep. Var. = Bond Offering Yield<br />

Conflict Discuss Neg Prior 6M + 0.270** 0.472** 0.391**<br />

[2.02] [1.99] [2.79]<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!