Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest
Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest
Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>of</strong> debt analysts’ conflict discussions, we control for debt analysts’ recommendations and<br />
recommendation changes.<br />
We also control for bond characteristics that are likely to affect the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the<br />
bond issuance yields, such as the number <strong>of</strong> covenants, maturity, and <strong>of</strong>fering amount. As the<br />
agency theory <strong>of</strong> covenants suggests that there is a trade-<strong>of</strong>f between the number <strong>of</strong> covenant<br />
restrictions and the interest rate (Smith and Warner, 1979), we expect the number <strong>of</strong> covenants to<br />
be negatively related to the <strong>of</strong>fering yield. Bonds with longer maturities are usually exposed to<br />
greater interest and credit risks, and therefore are likely priced at higher yields. We do not have a<br />
prediction regarding the sign <strong>of</strong> the association between a bond’s <strong>of</strong>fering yield and the size <strong>of</strong> its<br />
<strong>of</strong>fering amount. On one hand, larger bond issues are typically more liquid and marketable and<br />
thus should be priced at lower yields. On the other hand, larger bond issues imply a higher debt<br />
burden for the borrower, and therefore may be associated with a higher probability <strong>of</strong> default.<br />
We also include bond complexity in our specification, but again do not predict the sign <strong>of</strong> its<br />
relation to <strong>of</strong>fering yield. Complex bonds are more difficult to value and tend to be less liquid<br />
(Harris and Piwowar, 2006; Edwards et al., 2007), suggesting that more complex bonds should<br />
be priced at higher yields. In contrast, complex bonds have features such as put options, credit<br />
enhancements, or sinking fund provisions that can lower the <strong>of</strong>fering yield.<br />
In addition, we control for firm characteristics that include size, leverage, and interest<br />
coverage. Consistent with prior literature, we expect bond <strong>of</strong>fering yields to increase with firm<br />
leverage and decrease with firm size and interest coverage. Next, we add an indicator variable<br />
that flags the existence <strong>of</strong> private bank debt at the bond’s issuance date. We predict a negative<br />
association between the <strong>of</strong>fering yield and private borrowings because we expect bank<br />
monitoring to benefit bond holders (Datta, Iskandar-Datta, and Patel, 1999).<br />
36